• 0

    posted a message on combat in 1.9 good or bad?

    Its been a year now, get over it.

    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 1.9 disaster...

    The only thing thats a disaster is the community lol

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 1

    posted a message on What is the scariest creepypasta you've ever read/listened to?

    None, edgy garbage written by teenagers doesn't really interest me that much.

    Posted in: General Off Topic
  • 0

    posted a message on Why most are hating 1.9?

    The tisum maybe?

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on Is it possible to make a bukkit server for minecraft 1.8.1
    Read your post up to dk64 being garbage. You have bad taste in games.
    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on Thirst on Hard mode
    How about no, never. No more bars in minecraft.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    You know the reaction to this whole eula thing shows one huge flaw in this community. Its gotten horrible over the past 2 years.

    "No! we dont want horses"

    "No! we dont like the emerald ore"

    "We criticize every little mistake you do!"

    "Why change the book recipe?"

    Geeze.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    Picture it, you start looking for a server to join. You're looking and looking,what you see is "donate now and receive a sharpness 10 sword.
    You just roll your eyes, thinking the owner is really desperate. But then you see 10 more,30 more,50 more saying the same thing.
    Then you realize that there are way to many servers doing the same thing, drowning out servers who don't have to hawk in game items to stay afloat. Then you just give up disgust.

    Yeah...
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    Quote from Ecu

    I really wish people would actually evaluate the result of Mojang's actions rather then blindly siding with Mojang. I asked a question openly, to multiple people and the best I got was, "We'll still be allowed to play Minecraft." This is just ridiculous. Why do you agree with Mojang's decision if you cannot even give me a reason why it will benefit the community?

    I stand by one of my earlier statements in that those that are against pay for perk features are jealous of those that were able to pay for such features, because all I hear is complaints against said feature without any actual good reasons as to why. It's a crude way to look at it, but honestly they dodge any direct request for a reason, so what else am I to think?

    However, I can actually explain multiple reasons as to why it is BAD for the community. It could potentially (and according to one large server that has posted, may actually) cause people to lose their jobs (which could potentially make people/families homeless), it could inhibit the gameplay of such servers as they are forced to use alternative means for income beyond gameplay features. It actually directly stifles creation by limiting what you're allowed to make (no capes). It creates a bad impression that Mojang will take away from the community at any time for any reason without negotiation. I've got plenty of reasons its NOT good for the community. I cannot really find one reason its good.



    One thing I'd like to keep mind for those that reply to me, I don't play on large servers. I design mod content and art. I'm the original creator of the Ender Storage mod, I occasionally twitch stream and I've been contributing my other ideas to various other mods over the years (be it art or gameplay concepts). I don't actually lose much myself by these restrictions, but I am still speaking against them. I also am acting and not just speaking by actually moving my content creation to a open source platform (http://minetest.net) which will give me the ability to make content and have rights over said content.


    No one cares if you are moving somewhere else,please stop acting like we do.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on [1.7.2] Changing item name color
    Nvm mind eclipse was acting stupid.
    Thank you man.
    Posted in: Modification Development
  • 0

    posted a message on [1.7.2] Changing item name color
    How to I change the name color of an item? Iv tried changing it in the lang file but it didn't work.
    Posted in: Modification Development
  • 2

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    I love how this community treated minecraft as some agorist experiment. We really don't need big servers, just make multiplayer fun again.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    Quote from qwerti10

    why? because you dont think about it! Don't you get it? If they do that all the big servers will stop! they only could sell cosmetic things like name tag color (who do you think buys that?). About 50% of all the content in the www is based on big servers: youtube vides/ let's plays/ animations, Maps, Animations, Plugins. Not only that all this people are jobless then (big server teams) also alot of players will stop playing the game (also players who have nothing to do with it because so much good stuff will just get killed).


    This community needs weeding out anyway. Plus its only servers that are affected, l2 read.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    I love how the p2w server owners are pushing this Realms conspiracy. Gotta blame something other than yourselves, right?
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    Just get rid of the op commands like /fly. This is what im mostly talking about. That and OP gear.
    You dont need a Sharpness ten sword come on now actually play the game.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • To post a comment, please .