If they wanted duplication on small flowers, they'll add it in.
You could say that for almost any suggestion.
"If they wanted nether brick doors, they'd add it in."
"If they wanted different colored bed sheets, they'd add it in."
I like this, it can make it easier if you're trying to farm 1 specific flower as opposed to continuously spamming bonemeal until you get the flower you want.
Borders would make the texture seem grid-like, which looks horrible in large amounts, and a darker look is just your preference, which is anything but valid in this case. The compressed cobblestone in Extra Utilities are meant for storage and the borders and darker look are to differentiate it from normal cobblestone, but the compact cobblestone here is also intended for building.
The compression is also more than enough, as this again not only meant for storing large amounts of cobblestone, but also for building, and a 9|1 conversion rate is a bit too expensive for a building block.
Overall, it's insulting that you're criticizing my texture when it's purely based upon the fact that the texture is not what you expect, and to prove my point further I've added a slightly dark border around the texture so you can take a look.
You can clearly see the grid and where each texture starts and ends, which is one of the worst things you can do for a block that should be used seamlessly. I will take criticism any day, but catering to a person's belief in what a block's texture should be is not anything related to criticism at all.
I'd like to see you make this bordered dark cobblestone that you so blatantly ripped off from Extra Utilities, and make it seamless and look good as a replacement to gravel roads in villages. No connected textures allowed, by the way.
I really don't think it looks good. Like you said, it's not seamless. The original one was seamless, and in my opinion, better looking. But, I'll put it up there.
Perhaps the Enraged Fire Charge should either have a more expensive crafting recipe or not be given the ability to break blocks.
I don't think there should be an enraged fire charge, because once a griefer gets their hands on it, they've got a lot of power they couldn't have before.
Also, sorry you haven't been getting much attention, this idea should be seen by others. Hopefully it will be getting more attention soon.
The thing I like most about this idea which I feel is worth mentioning is how original it is. In my 1-2 months on the MCF, with all the combat suggestions I've seen, this is the first one to be somewhat original and to make sense to some extent. All that I've seen up until now is
Yeah, but no offense to the creator of that texture, but it is sooo ugly! It needs some sort of border, and a darker look. And It does need to be compressed more than simply 4 cobble into 1.
9|1 might not be bad, but 4 is pretty good. I also wouldn't want to have to raise the blast resistance, and raise the the time it takes to mine further.
Check out this page from the Extra Utilites mod, if the cobblestone could be compressed this much, and if the textures looked like these too, I think I would give this full support, (If you use their idea you should give them credit btw), anyways, I think this mod has the correct textures, and the right amount of compression, however, no need for the "Deep Dark" or the "Bedrockium Ingots/Blocks"
Not if we consider the blast resistance of the cobblestone to be relative to its density. Compressing four blocks into one only gives you twice the density, not four times. (eg. the mass is divided out over three dimensions rather than two)
And from a gameplay perspective, cobblestone is extremely common. So the benefit should be minimal.
If someone makes a criticism, it doesn't mean they're a troll.
AlphaPrimero: "This idea has problems with A, B, C, and D. It could be corrected with this, no support."
BravoSegundo: "Is it just me or is AlphaPrimero trolling?"
CharlieTerzo: "Alpha is just trolling."
No, AlphaPrimero is _not_ trolling, and your mob bullying techniques are dangerous and shameful. There's a REASON why calling someone a troll is a bad thing. This act is ad hominem and a red herring. Let me explain both of these here:
Ad hominem - Latin. Against the person - is an attack on the person instead of his position. It is disrespectful and childish (akin to calling someone a poopie-head because they're winning an argument.) Calling someone a troll is equivalent here. This is a logical fallacy as the qualifications of the speaker have little to do with the qualifications of the discussion. (a professional garbage truck driver is just as capable of stating understood facts about genetics as a geneticist; although the geneticist will have a clearly understood greater understanding).
A red herring is an attempt to undermine the opponent by changing the discussion. In this case, changing the discussion from the solid counterpoints to the ad hominem attack.
How about you knuckleheads actually DISCUSS the points of the "troll" instead of accusing him of being a troll?
It's the same situation to mark them off as haters, correct?
2
You could say that for almost any suggestion.
"If they wanted nether brick doors, they'd add it in."
"If they wanted different colored bed sheets, they'd add it in."
0
If you're trying to be funny, it's not working.
0
I like this, it can make it easier if you're trying to farm 1 specific flower as opposed to continuously spamming bonemeal until you get the flower you want.
Support; can make it easier to farm flowers.
0
I really don't think it looks good. Like you said, it's not seamless. The original one was seamless, and in my opinion, better looking. But, I'll put it up there.
0
In a word: vague.
No support; vague.
0
I don't think there should be an enraged fire charge, because once a griefer gets their hands on it, they've got a lot of power they couldn't have before.
Also, sorry you haven't been getting much attention, this idea should be seen by others. Hopefully it will be getting more attention soon.
1
The thing I like most about this idea which I feel is worth mentioning is how original it is. In my 1-2 months on the MCF, with all the combat suggestions I've seen, this is the first one to be somewhat original and to make sense to some extent. All that I've seen up until now is
Poster: herp derp add lances spears shields ya 1.9 COMBAT ERRMAHHGERRRDD CONFIRMED!!!!
Critic 1: Unoriginal.
Poster: ITS JUS MAH FERST POST I DINT REED THE RULES COMM ON!!!!!!!111ONEONE!!!11
0
They actually did this for certain occasions in 2010.
ON TOPIC: This is a pretty good idea, regardless. I like the idea of temporary capes.
Support; a reasonable way to implement capes for every player,
0
9|1 might not be bad, but 4 is pretty good. I also wouldn't want to have to raise the blast resistance, and raise the the time it takes to mine further.
0
I'm a flash drive, why would you want to breathe fire on me?
0
I'm not going to use their mod, or anything from it, simply for originality.
0
This is a lot of micromanaging, and a lot to remember. To me, it seems to be less challenge and more annoyance.
No support; pointless and annoying.
1
Well, in very few cases, people are legitimately trolling or hating. Is it a minimal chance? Yes. Is it bad when it's actually happening? Yes.
Once again, minimal chance.
0
Alright then. I'll lower the blast resistance.
0
It's the same situation to mark them off as haters, correct?