I don't know, I might just be stupid, but what do you mean by armor attributes? I know basically what that means, but in terms of minecraft?
- flaminghawk83
- Registered Member
-
Member for 11 years
Last active Mon, Feb, 28 2022 22:09:05
- 3 Followers
- 4,077 Total Posts
- 392 Thanks
-
Sep 3, 2015flaminghawk83 posted a message on 1.9: Armor Will Have Custom Attributes, Will Not DegradePosted in: News
-
Jun 30, 2015flaminghawk83 posted a message on Telltale Games: "We've Got a Minecon Announcement"Posted in: News
Is it going to be separately downloaded, or part of minecraft?
-
Oct 22, 2013flaminghawk83 posted a message on 1.7 Pre-Release: "The Update That Changed the World"O_OPosted in: News
All I can say is "can't wait". I'm still in shock. -
May 16, 2013flaminghawk83 posted a message on Villager NewsI saw the video before I saw this! I love it!Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login.
0
Guys...please look at the date...please.
0
I would just like to add, that when making this guide, there was a pretty long conversation on this point. To be fair, the person posting this, this is just their personality. Being sarcastic is just how they talk. It adds character to the guide. You can't just saying "You made a mistake doing this, but it's fine. It's all fine.". You can't be overtly rude either, but this guide isn't. The guide is just telling people what they need to know. You can't just use the argument "Everyone else is doing it, so I can", but you can't completely change how you tell people things because a few people might be offended. People are always going to be offended.
If someone can't take something that is obviously sarcasm, directed at no one in particular, than I'm sorry, but they shouldn't be on the internet. What I mean is, this is almost practice. If someone can't take sarcasm that isn't directed on them, how on earth are they going to take rude comments from critics that are directly insulting them? And really, anyone mature enough to admit that their idea needs improving, and to ask for help, will probably be mature enough to realize that this isn't insulting them
In short, this guide isn't mean. It's mature.
Sorry, to add to this. Couldn't resist. I love a good debate.
0
Just want to point out real quick, that the fact that a couple FPS game have this, doesn't mean, it's a good idea for minecraft.
So, I like the idea of sneak attacks, and the way you implemented it. But I really don't like the dagger part. I can live with having a dagger, if it was implemented right. How you described it though, it just seems like "less x more y", but with helping the sneak attack. I personally feel that the dagger should just be less damage than a sword, but more when you're sneaking. This would also go more with was you said about adding another playing style besides the tank. You either have to have strong armor and a strong weapon to go in charging, or have weak armor and a weak weapon, and be skilled enough to get a bonus.
Not really sure how to do this, but something I'd like to see would be a way for sneaking to help in PvP using this new mechanic.
Partial Support.
2
That's assuming you have time to prepare. In this case, you don't.
1
Makes sense. No reason not to, really.
Support.
0
Partial support. I love the idea of having a huge battle with lots of mobs, but I don't really like different waves. It feels like a minigame. If I had it work, it'd probably be like this. If it happens, then 20-30 blocks away from your spawn point in all directions get a huge boost in a specific mob generation. For instance, if an Enderman siege happened, then in an areas 20-30 blocks away from your house in all directions, Endermen spawn chances (or rates or whatever) would get a 100% boost, and all endermen in this range are immediately hostile and aware of your current position. This would be like a siege, while having a more "natural" feeling. Also, not sure if this is possible.
Either way, partial support. I'd like to see this in some way or form.
0
Dude, that's not hate. That's critics telling you what they think about it, which is the whole. Job. It's not calling you an idiot. It's saying your idea is not good. That's what happens when you create a suggestion.
0
Overall, it seems pointless. It adds realism, but realism isn't always good. To paraphrase the suggestion guide, realism is a neutral property, not good or bad. It can sometimes add something good to a good suggestion, but it alone doesn't make a suggestion good.
Realism isn't a sole reason to add a suggestion. This is nothing but realism. Well, realism and annoying-ness. It's pointless. Besides, you say this is a "new" injury suggestions, and you'll "make us like it". But this seems like basically every other injury suggestion. If you want something like this, I'm sure there are mods out there.
No support.
1
I can see you at least put a lot of time into writing this thing. But still, no support. Like others have said, it wold be laggy, hard to code, and just plain annoying. Also, the fact that it used to be in the game is irrelevant. Yeah, it used to be in the game. That means it was taken out for a reason.
Also, not hating here, but I'm going to give you some tips on some stuff you did wrong to help you in the future.
Don't praise you're own idea. The fact that you posted it means you like it. We know what. At this point, your opinion on it is irrelevant.
Making something rare doesn't make it a good idea. Something being rare isn't bad, but it doesn't automatically make it good.
In the title, just vie the name of the suggestion. Don't make it a click bait by not giving us any information on the idea.
Give more info. I realize you were rushed, but then just wait. Having a half-assed idea isn't going to make us like it. Take some time, give us detail, and make us like it. Stats, spawn rates, and any info that we'd need.
The link is to a guide on how to make suggestions, made by some of the best suggestion makers and critics on here. It's worth a read.
Also, prove it to you? Almost everyone, some of whom most definitely code, are telling you it's not possible. Is that not proof enough? The fact is that, while this AI is not impossible, it is very complicated. It would be very hard to do for a AAA game, let along Mojang with java. And all that work, to make a pointless, griefing mob that a lot of people would dislike. Besides, you're pretty much saying, that you make a suggestion that isn't possible, but then we have to prove it isn't possible. Why don't you prove that it is? What about the other arguments, too? You just ignoring those?
0
I agree with the feeling you're trying to convey, but you're kinda over exaggerating. It won't be game breaking. You can only use it when you have commands, so it doesn't break multiplayer, and you don't have to use it in survival.
I do think that it's good for options and game customization, which is important in a game like minecraft. However, like Shaddura said, you're asking to make something easier so it doesn't have to be easy. That makes no sense. If you want to build, build. If you want to survive, survive. But it seems like a bad idea to mix them, and will take away from each. You don't have the pride of having a pure, survival built world. But since resources are limited, you won't be able to make awesome builds like in creative. It mixes two things that takes away from each.
No support.
Yes, they did add it. However, what you seem to not realize is that they removed it.
And they removed it for a reason. I think the fact that it used to be
in the game, and no longer is, is a great reason not to add it again.
0
Yeah, no support then. That would just look dumb.
Sorry.
0
Dude, calm down. The chance of something completely burning down because of lightning is near impossible. I'm also kind of confused about the suggestion. What exactly are you asking?
0
I like the new enchantment. Considering we have one for spiders and undead, end creatures seem to fit.
0
This is a bridge I made using World Edit. I was just trying it out, but decided to make something, 'cause why not? This is how it turned out. So, I'm just asking on anyone's opinion on it. Also, any advice on any details that would make it look better?
0
As horses said, I think that you should add more variation. maybe add some pillars or something, so it's not just a few boxes on each other with the same colors. However, it's a very good design.
Keep going!