i used to love your texture pack, and I havent played MC sinced 1.7.3
I got back on the other day, and saw the 1.7.3 sphax in my folder, and I crossed my fingers as i googled it. Im really happy that this is still being worked on!
this is pretty cool. if you have a need for testers i can help test. i can also help but i realize you probly wont let me develop unless i put together a bit of a resume, which im not planning on doing.
does it have support for creative mode? such as the instabreak and automatically getting the needed items? if so i definitely will use and tell my friends on my server.
you know the glitch where the world doesnt fully delete?
well i accidentally deleted a world, and played on a new one for about 3 IRL weeks before i found my old base.
it was ****ing awesome.
I know this is going to sound nerdy but the human eye can only see like 34 frames per second so 30 is as really good to the human eye. For example if you are watching a YouTube video with 35 frames then watch another video with 200 frames the only difference you can see or hear is the annoying person bragging about his fps. :tongue.gif:
false. the human eye is very complex and doesnt see motion in fps, so narrowing it down to one number is ridiculous and there is no evidence to support that number. and the eye can easily percieve images that are flashed at 100 fps and higher, so that number is far too low if you were just trying to estimate.
there are other issues with lower framerates, such as unsynchronized rates with the monitor, where a higher fps is beneficial because the rates will match up more often.
stop trying to compensate for your bad framerate by saying its the same difference. it isnt.
and dont ask others what is bad. if you dont mind that framerate than it is just fine and dandy. if you cant stand under 50 than 30 would suck. its all subjective. however comparatively that is pretty average for a mid-range computer, especially if you arent running programs like gamebooster or using mods like optifog.
hes not saying put in realistic mountains because minecraft needs to be realistic-er. he is saying realistic mountains are a part of the game that would look better in a more realistic fashion.
try not to take the point he is trying to communicate with and apply it to situations he didnt intend it to be applied to in order to argue with it, because in the context he was refering it was actually a good suggestion, and if you disagree than argue with it in the context he was referring to.
this looks fun.
i would like to see one that is incredibly big. as in, you feel like you are playing one of the actual vechs super hostile maps in a tiny lane against people.
so if you want to do another, i think it would be really cool.
0
i used to love your texture pack, and I havent played MC sinced 1.7.3
I got back on the other day, and saw the 1.7.3 sphax in my folder, and I crossed my fingers as i googled it. Im really happy that this is still being worked on!
0
0
0
does it have support for creative mode? such as the instabreak and automatically getting the needed items? if so i definitely will use and tell my friends on my server.
0
0
0
well i accidentally deleted a world, and played on a new one for about 3 IRL weeks before i found my old base.
it was ****ing awesome.
0
0
but i agree they are useless.
1
false. the human eye is very complex and doesnt see motion in fps, so narrowing it down to one number is ridiculous and there is no evidence to support that number. and the eye can easily percieve images that are flashed at 100 fps and higher, so that number is far too low if you were just trying to estimate.
there are other issues with lower framerates, such as unsynchronized rates with the monitor, where a higher fps is beneficial because the rates will match up more often.
stop trying to compensate for your bad framerate by saying its the same difference. it isnt.
and dont ask others what is bad. if you dont mind that framerate than it is just fine and dandy. if you cant stand under 50 than 30 would suck. its all subjective. however comparatively that is pretty average for a mid-range computer, especially if you arent running programs like gamebooster or using mods like optifog.
0
this could be used with the tool that gives maps custom images to make custom pictures :biggrin.gif: thats pretty neat.
0
try not to take the point he is trying to communicate with and apply it to situations he didnt intend it to be applied to in order to argue with it, because in the context he was refering it was actually a good suggestion, and if you disagree than argue with it in the context he was referring to.
1
0
i wouldnt say that. its kind of old information, ive seen it in several places. it could easily be original stuff.
0
i would like to see one that is incredibly big. as in, you feel like you are playing one of the actual vechs super hostile maps in a tiny lane against people.
so if you want to do another, i think it would be really cool.