• 0

    posted a message on Golden Overload!
    Gold isn't meant to be useful. End.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Brace Blocks
    Quote from SirTrousers

    Cheap? Well, relatively, yes, because iron and gold blocks are ridiculously expensive to manufacture in sufficient masses. Obsidian provides security unmatched by any other block, and its hard to get. Braces would be a fair middle ground.



    If you want security, get obsidian.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Brace Blocks
    Quote from SirTrousers

    Iron blocks are easy to destroy and a general eyesore.


    And how would these be any different?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Brace Blocks
    Cheap built-in way to have aesthetics and security...No.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on New Swords
    Quote from Arcran

    You **** your name in the snow. Ygdrasel pisses his name in bedrock.


    I'd sig this but the new forum's sig limits are the dumbest ****in thing in this place.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Spleef Block
    Quote from thegreatninjaman

    Most of us have played spleef but i have noticed that spleef is harder to play in SMP because there is only a few blocks that can be destroyed fast without tools, and most of those blocks drop nothing. my idea is the spleef machine. the spleef machine will generate spleef blocks (in item form) when powered. spleef blocks do not drop anything when destroyed. spleef blocks get destroyed with a single click. they would be white or black in color.


    Just use dirt.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Brace Blocks
    So, they'd be iron blocks.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on New Swords
    Quote from o0anon0o

    Because then you sound like a jack ass.


    No, then I sound like an asshole and a jerk, both of which I gladly admit to being.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Auto Crafter
    Quote from Udontlikecake

    Listen I just thought it was a nice idea for people who craft a lot that's it there is not need to tell me to go to creative nor am I lazy IT WAS A SUGGESTION god
    Can you at least give constructive criticism I am NOT lazy but I am thinking of other people

    You should try it sometime it's called being kind


    It's called thinking of other lazy people. If you don't want to craft things, don't. End of.

    I'm kind to people who deserve it. Fools that make assumptions of my character deserve ****.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on New Swords
    Quote from o0anon0o

    Do you reallly need to call it a crappy idea? Just say you don't like it and be done.



    Better idea: How about I call it crap, which I have a right to do, and YOU be done?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Zombie midgets
    Quote from agentstaple

    just because an ideas stupid does not mean its not good :tongue.gif:


    ...Yes. That is exactly what it means.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Auto Crafter
    Quote from Udontlikecake

    Ok maybe it wasn't the best idea but you don't all have to be total asses about it
    AWOH I'm looking at you



    Telling you ways you can be lazy like you want to...Is being a "total ass"?

    Wut?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on New Swords

    Fire Sword: Crafting - Bottom middle = Flint & Steel, Middle = Coal, Top middle = Coal
    Damage: 8 Hearts
    *Takes 350 Hits to lose
    *When wet, the sword becomes an Iron sword until it leaves the water or exits the rain
    *Has a 20% chance of lighting targets on fire when hit.
    *Not recommended in wooden buildings



    New swords...Swords....SwordS...Plural...One suggestion...Wut.


    Also, crappy idea.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Zombie midgets
    Quote from agentstaple

    I think its a stupid idea but so is making a game entirely out of blocks


    So why are you here?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Grills
    Quote from BorgMercenary

    I can think of rationale against this, that being that it takes significantly longer than building one grill and loading in eight food items. It also uses more resources, considering building enough furnaces for the same amount of food held by one grill takes a full stack of cobblestone. You also have the energy loss as described earlier in this thread. These grills would be a lossless way to grill food quickly.



    You have to take time and resources to cook food for survival? God forbid!

    Energy loss? So? You still get the food cooked. If furnaces have an energy loss issue, why not just fix it?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • To post a comment, please .