- RunnerX
- Registered Member
-
Member for 11 years, 5 months, and 20 days
Last active Wed, Apr, 19 2017 12:37:43
- 2 Followers
- 1,013 Total Posts
- 40 Thanks
-
Apr 27, 2014RunnerX posted a message on Wednesday With Sach: What Is Minecraft, and What About...Minecraft to me is less of a game and more of an engine for creation.Posted in: News
-
Apr 18, 2014RunnerX posted a message on An April ApologySo nothing's changed.Posted in: News
(huehuehuehuehue) -
Mar 28, 2014RunnerX posted a message on Minecraft No Longer Officially Working With Oculus RiftPosted in: News
Words of beauty.
Plus, I don't find VR all that captivating. Especially for gaming purposes. -
Feb 17, 2014RunnerX posted a message on 7 Reasons to Date a Gamer This Valentines DayLame. I've seen YouTube poops more entertaining than this.Posted in: News
I just hope this wasn't intended to be serious... -
Feb 13, 2014RunnerX posted a message on Universal Death Clock (in Minecraft)This is horrific.Posted in: News
Yet not so horrific as knowing
for whom the door opens. -
May 16, 2013RunnerX posted a message on Minecraft Parody: "Grieferman"Posted in: NewsQuote from XavierHorovitz
That was pretty poorly animated compared to other parodies.
Also, "griefing" isn't a thing. It's called playing survival.
In my opinion the CGI makes MC animation videos poor in general. The reason I liked the animation in this one is because it felt more Minecraft-ish what with the static facial expressions and the non-fingered hands (like the actual player model). -
May 16, 2013RunnerX posted a message on Minecraft Parody: "Grieferman"Posted in: News
It's a pity inthelittlewood hasn't made more, he's a pro at that. And I was hopin gfor another good one since "Trade Shop" was completely terrible... -
May 16, 2013RunnerX posted a message on Minecraft Parody: "Grieferman"YES.Posted in: News
I love the original song (a fat Korean guy trolling people, what's not to like?) but this is just brilliant.
Plus it doesn't use that hideous CGI animation like Minecraft Style did. - To post a comment, please login.
0
0
I already read the OP and most of the discussion after that a while ago, so I'm assuming your goals haven't changed.
As to the book analogy, what if I read a review?
No no, I did read the thread; I just haven't been keeping tabs on it for a while.
I just wanted to show some people the pointlessness of this argument. Granted, I can't bring EVERYBODY out of it, thinking that would be naive. It's frankly embarrassing to have one of the biggest threads on the forum be about something as ignorable as terrain. (Especially with the 1.7 changes.)
If you look in the suggestions forum, you will occasionally see a really good suggestion. Chances are it will never be implemented. It is somewhat sad, but there are just too many suggestions that people have to look through and consider implementing good ones. If you were to say, publicize your case in some grand fashion, then you'd have a better chance. (Making a thread is minimally impactful.)
The reason you're annoying is because after two years that this thread has been hanging around you still haven't let the issue go. 1.7 will most likely put any more thought of terrain improvement out of the Devs minds for a indefinite period of time, making your wait even longer. Since there's minimal chance that you will ever get exactly what you what, this cycle could continue (potentially) forever. (the being, you complain -> Devs hear some of the complaints and make some terrain changes -> they put it aside for a while to work on other things -> you're still not happy -> you complain)
DING DING DING! Give the boy a cigar!
A word about beaches...
Among the features is gravel beaches, correct? I am fairly that a basic form of gravel beach has been re-implemented in the snapshot. I agree with you when you say they're not really beaches, the one I saw was just a patch of gravel along a riverside. The reason I make this note is to say that I doubt the Devs will leave it at that, seeing as how gravel beaches have been wanted back since they were taken out. Just a prediction.
0
Uuhh...sure. We'll go with that.
And earlier I meant to say "I think YOU'RE the one missing implications.
That "don't" was left behind from an earlier thought I had, so I forgot to backspace it.
Sorry, but hauling myself through unspoilered pages upon pages of rant, rant, and (you guessed it!) rant isn't really my idea of a good time.
I have, for the sole reason that I DON'T CARE. It is a small, ignorable issue, and most beaches I see are added on to desert biomes so it's barely noticeable.
No, and typically when someone gripes they keep doing it until they get their way. Annoyingly so. The annoying part is what differentiates griping from being persistent.
0
0
Short list? The ideal generation according to you people is nowhere near that of the current generator. I suppose "nitpicking" would be a better term for what you're doing, rather than giving specifications.
True, requesting features =/= griping. But this isn't a thread about "requesting features". You're griping. If it was a thread about requesting features, you would have let it go by now. A "request" is one a done. A gripe stays until it is either alleviated or rejected.
Also,
how dare you defile the visage of Inigo Montoya by putting it in a dispute as pointless as this...
(I said "gripe" exactly once. I don't think YOU'RE the one missing implications here.)
0
If a mod has done it, it nearly guarantees that it will never be something implemented into vanilla. (Granted there are some exceptions, i.e. pistons and horses.)
There is pretty much no possibility that Mojang will adhere to your exact specifications no matter how much you gripe, oh I'm sorry, critique, the world generation.
1.7 will be making significant changes. Take that and leave.
My sentiments precisely.
0
Name them
0
New generation is coming...
the world is getting a complete overhaul.
To all of those regular posters in this thread...
CAN YOU PLEASE SHUT UP NOW?
0
When people pick them up he says "Keep it, I've got a million more at home."
(For those of you who don't know, this is a long-running joke on The Shaft)
1
This is an off-topic syndrome.
But seriously, this happened to me. Although I do check out the discussion thread every now and then.
0
And remembered the formula for acetate.
(C2H3O2)
0
0
And magic. after all, magic is just science we don't understand yet.
0
Think about it...
0
4500?!
That's half of 9000!!!!