I'm not 100% sure so do a little research of your own. What lanayru3 posted is what i have and i know for a fact it works so if you don't want to take your chances go with that.
Wait I thought the USA was the only country in the world. Joking aside my point stands as a general statement unless you have stupid markups in your country.
I abuse the Edit button a lot.
I used to think that up until i was about 8 lmao you should have seen the look on my face when i learned otherwise
Used technology is never a good idea. You never know what the past used did to that lol. For example i had an old computer that was under my desk and i constantly accidentally kicked it on it's side. It worked fine for a few months and one day i turned it on and nothing happened so i opened it up and it turns out my cpu cooler and become knocked loose and i fried the cpu. Whenever you buy used hardware you take a risk and it is up to you if that risk is worth the price.
Best sentence to type would be "the quick fox jumps over the lazy brown dog" since it contains every letter in the alphabet, its good practice
Lmao i almost forgot about that. They used to make us type that over and over and over again when i was in 5th grade. They used to make us sit with the proper posture and all that stuff too. (As i am typing this i am sitting cross legged in my chair lol)
And look who wins in the benchmark Intel does.
AMD does not save you money at all CPU wise.
AMD does well with Graphics and that is it at this point.
Also stop linking that DAM video its old its from 2010 its 2012 the situation has changed.
Don't get me wrong i know most intel processors beat AMD in the benchmarks but i paid 150 for my phenom II x4 955 BE whereas i would have had to pay 250 for the intel i5 2500k (I had no idea that the i3 beat the x4 in the benchmarks but i wanted a quad core so i didn't look into the i3) My point is that each company meets different needs for different customers.
They will live because of APU's and their graphics cards, not their desktop cpu's.
Not everyone wants to spend 250$ for their CPU granted it will perform better but some people are on a budget. If their next series fails they will be hurt but i think they will keep on trucking because where there is hardware fanboys follow and i know quite a few people who won't be ready to give up on AMD
So there is a $100 difference if we count rebates.
It is also the difference between a card lasting 3 years or 4 years so if he can it would be better to extend the budget but if he just can't wait yes the superclocked version would be the right choice for him.
Don't spraypaint your keyboard. Just allocate about an hour a day to just typing. Open up word and type with your eyes closed about your day or type a simple sentence over and over again. Don't worry about accuracy that will come with time. The main thing is not to look at the keyboard no matter how bad you think you are doing. Eventually you will learn that muscle memory and know where every key is. Remember this takes time and is not just going to happen overnight; practice makes perfect!
I think AMD will live because they provide decent CPU's for people on a budget. No they don't outperform intel but if you don't have money burning a hole in your pocket then AMD is the choice for you.
0
0
I'm not 100% sure so do a little research of your own. What lanayru3 posted is what i have and i know for a fact it works so if you don't want to take your chances go with that.
0
I used to think that up until i was about 8 lmao you should have seen the look on my face when i learned otherwise
0
I believe that would work.
0
2
Indeed.. the stupidity is growing at an alarming pace
0
0
Used technology is never a good idea. You never know what the past used did to that lol. For example i had an old computer that was under my desk and i constantly accidentally kicked it on it's side. It worked fine for a few months and one day i turned it on and nothing happened so i opened it up and it turns out my cpu cooler and become knocked loose and i fried the cpu. Whenever you buy used hardware you take a risk and it is up to you if that risk is worth the price.
0
Lmao i almost forgot about that. They used to make us type that over and over and over again when i was in 5th grade. They used to make us sit with the proper posture and all that stuff too. (As i am typing this i am sitting cross legged in my chair lol)
0
Exactly my point. It all depends on the consumer's needs.
Don't get me wrong i know most intel processors beat AMD in the benchmarks but i paid 150 for my phenom II x4 955 BE whereas i would have had to pay 250 for the intel i5 2500k (I had no idea that the i3 beat the x4 in the benchmarks but i wanted a quad core so i didn't look into the i3) My point is that each company meets different needs for different customers.
0
Well in my defense the 448 core version only comes with the 560ti :tongue.gif: but yes i did forget to put the ti my fault
0
Not everyone wants to spend 250$ for their CPU granted it will perform better but some people are on a budget. If their next series fails they will be hurt but i think they will keep on trucking because where there is hardware fanboys follow and i know quite a few people who won't be ready to give up on AMD
0
It is also the difference between a card lasting 3 years or 4 years so if he can it would be better to extend the budget but if he just can't wait yes the superclocked version would be the right choice for him.
0
0