I'm looking for a mod that's client side only, and allows you to mute or gag any player you don't want to listen to/read the text of. It should work both on players actually in the game, and on messages sent from external mods or whatever. perhaps have it set up to search each incoming line of text in the chat for the strings you (the user) set.
That way, if a server has a mod allowing people in an IRC channel to talk to people in the server, but they're not formatted like "<username>" but instead "[WEB]127.0.0.1:", i can still gag them so i don't have to deal with them.
Perhaps have two separate list. a standard gag list, in which you type in a players name and it gags them (!gag [playername]), and a special gag list, in which you can type in any string (case sensitive), and if an incoming line of text contains that string, it won't be shown (!sgag [string])
None of the above. A decent Minecrart implementation easily top's my personal list at current. Followed closely by the Modding API and the ability to press up in the console to access the last command :tongue.gif:
derp. i meant to make "better mod support" an option, but i guess i got distracted
Getting moderators to ban folks for making redundant, poorly constructed threads in the wrong place with no "other" option.
Quote from redmercury »
it's missing quite a few valid candidates.
sorry about that, i woulda put probably twice as many options, but there was a limit of 10, and i was looking for specifics. also, at kark, there's no call to act like a
Quote from Aprch »
Can I click them all?
:A
Seriously, I voted trapdoors, but it could be gameplay improvements, more blocks, more redstone stuff, anything in the list suits fine for an incoming update. At least for me.
i seriously considered letting people check 2 or 3 options, but what i'm looking for is what you want developed the MOST.
i'm now thinking i still shoulda allowed people to vote for 2 options :/
After using the same seed and looking around, i was able to find the same swimming pool. this is proof for me that using the same seed will generate the same world
0
0
This.
I really need to learn to back up my minecraft.jar file.
0
0
That way, if a server has a mod allowing people in an IRC channel to talk to people in the server, but they're not formatted like "<username>" but instead "[WEB]127.0.0.1:", i can still gag them so i don't have to deal with them.
Perhaps have two separate list. a standard gag list, in which you type in a players name and it gags them (!gag [playername]), and a special gag list, in which you can type in any string (case sensitive), and if an incoming line of text contains that string, it won't be shown (!sgag [string])
0
Alone... Lost....... Naked.... How will i survive?
0
you spawn at a BEAUTIFUL hilly forestland.
and at -40 +35, you see DOUBLE CAVES :biggrin.gif:
havn't actually played on it yet, but I intend to make the one with the larger opening my home and the other my mine
0
derp. i meant to make "better mod support" an option, but i guess i got distracted
0
sorry about that, i woulda put probably twice as many options, but there was a limit of 10, and i was looking for specifics. also, at kark, there's no call to act like a
i seriously considered letting people check 2 or 3 options, but what i'm looking for is what you want developed the MOST.
i'm now thinking i still shoulda allowed people to vote for 2 options :/
0
0
After using the same seed and looking around, i was able to find the same swimming pool. this is proof for me that using the same seed will generate the same world
0
0
um. yes it is. if entire code's the same thing, except for like 10 lines which transelate between java and c, it's stealing code :/
0
0
0
not a programmer.