• 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    Quote from CommanderDrenn

    Quote from Winter_Mage



    So the server owner should be able to make money off of something that isn't their property because they can't afford to run a server they created?

    Their self-created need should override Mojang's right?

    If you chuckled at the fairness bit then you shouldn't have a problem with Mojang taking action.

    I feel I've addressed your first point.

    However, what do you think of servers taking in donations and that purely goes into the server? These donations are going to buy small things at reasonable prices, such as 10 cents for a diamond or whatever.

    As for the "self-created need" these server's needs are, for all practical purposes, Minecraft's needs. Without servers, Minecraft wouldn't have sold however many millions of copies it has. I understand that it is Mojang's right implement their Eula, however I fail to see why they are doing so. It seems completely unreasonable, and they'll lose a good number of long-time players due to the fact that good, solid servers are being shut down.

    In short, beyond increased realms sales and a dubious increase in reputation, what does Mojang stand to gain?


    Quote from Winter_Mage

    Quote from CommanderDrenn

    Because large servers are expensive.

    Btw, "in the name of fairness" made me chuckle.


    So the server owner should be able to make money off of something that isn't their property because they can't afford to run a server they created?

    Their self-created need should override Mojang's right?If you chuckled at the fairness bit then you shouldn't have a problem with Mojang taking action.

    Really Good Question(s)
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    The "EXTREAMELY FRIENDILY REMINDER OF FRIENDILINESS AND HAPPY-JOY FEELINGS" is bull, also sarcasm
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EULA Revisited: an Updated Q&A From Mojang
    Quote from CommanderDrenn

    I strongly disagree. I think this is the WORST thing ever to happen to Minecraft, including clay blocks. Most servers are going down, because people don't donate to servers without expecting something in return. As for cosmetic stuff, most people don't give a darn about that.

    I only wonder.. Why? Why would Mojang make this negative move against the community? If you actually think they care about what is "fair" then you're kidding yourself. If you don't like what a server is doing in terms of selling stuff, don't play. Eventually, that server will survive or die by the will of the players.

    Anyway, the server I play on is small scale enough that this won't affect me. The community is tight-knit enough that Mojang won't even notice.

    This is too much Mojang like one person that I read he said "you Have Bullets in your gun to shoot but you shot one at your foot!" So why mojang why.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Mojang Announcement: EULA, and Servers
    Quote from Artifact123

    RIP crappy servers.

    Good riddance.


    Not all of the servers are crappy but that kills almost every fair and legit payed for server so there mojang now you have done it
    Posted in: Discussion
  • To post a comment, please .