I cant say for sure, anvils were early, I think. Withers and withes are nice, but book and quills are overdue (no pun intended) and hoppers may appear. Anyway, (I resent the decision) horses were confirmed, so could other early blocks come...
How were horses confirmed? I haven't seen this. The only thing mentioned was a blip on the front of the news section that said 4J said horses were being added. 4J has not said that, ever. The only official mention was a tweet that said horses would be in a future update, that's it. What is this source everybody keeps referencing? I need to see this.
The Minecraft 360 update was to add the ability to transfer 360 worlds to the Xbox One edition as Mustache pointed out, unless you're talking about a system update in which case it's just a system update. The Minecraft PC update was the 1.8 Bountiful update. Two completely separate things released almost at the same time.
Sorry, no support. Even though bats are the only useless mob (literally, not even XP) I like the ambiance. Plus they scare the hell out of you when you least expect it..... flying out of their holes when you're trying to mine. But I like the extra they give.
Good advice. I have 2 profiles, one set to use 1.7.10 and the other for the latest version and development versions enabled. Be careful though. Even though you have more than one profile you can still see all of your worlds on the loading screen regardless of which profile you're using. Make sure you know what world you want to play on which profile!
Sounds like you're either in a snapshot or 1.8 release. If you're using the launcher, look in the bottom right of the window and it will tell you what version you are about to play. Sometimes you have to check the profile to see if it's set to automatically play the latest version.
I can vouch for this as the only reason I am in this board is to see where that has went .
I feel the troubleshoot given here above is anything but. The reputation tab showed what of your feedback was liked and what posts you yourself have liked. Random numbers are nothing more than random numbers. If you hover over my reputation it shows I have given 98 likes. Okay? So what? How is that valuable information to anybody? Personally, when I received a like, I liked to see where it came from and possibly visiting the thread to see why I received it. I feel it was silly to remove this tab as it can help shape some of the comments on this forum.
Ah well.. not like anything will be done about it anyways. Sorry to see it go.
I completely agree. Getting a Like was significant and I liked to see where I got it and why, just as you said. But I do remember it was fairly easy to see how many Likes that individual had received. And I miss the different rankings you would get with the number of Likes you received, not to sound conceited or anything.
I'm mining 2 chunks all the way down to bedrock for my slime farm and I've already gone through 4 diamond picks with unbreaking and efficiency. Diamond is supposed to be rare and when you find it you should run and grab your fortune pick to try and get as many diamonds as you can from it.
Oh man, it used to be on the left side of any thread right under the user's profile picture and the number of posts. I think it was just to hover over their name? I don't remember exactly how it was done but I remember it was easy to see rep, which was just the "Likes" the person had received. I remember you could see both "Likes" given and received but that was on the profile page under reputation.
Too big? 100x100 blocks is barely enough to contain a single cave system, which I can explore in a day of playing after I've become established; my biggest world is 2000x4000 blocks with much of it explored out underground; why should I have to make a new world every few days?.
BTW, to get 4 diamonds ...
That just proved my point. My suggestion, to have a smaller world, would take away from you. I'm all for suggestions that add but not the ones that reduce or take away. My original comment was for the OP. Why would the fortune enchantment need nurfing? That was my only question. And I understand that is just an opinion, no offense was given. And it goes back to the "enough" comment. Are we saying that we need limits for everyone? Not everyone can get lucky so just bring the bar down for everyone?
No, I found that out after the change. The extra step is a little inconvenient considering that we used to just be able to hover over someone's name anywhere and see their rep.
I, like many others, am getting used to the new site format. I've noticed the "Likes" changing. They are slowly but surely fading away. They're gone now actually. I can't find a reputation tab. And why were the Likes and Dislikes merged into one group? Now, two people can have the same rep but one guy actually received the likes and the other just gave them away randomly? Sorry... "Thanks". Were people complaining? I never read anything like that. Don't get me wrong, I like the site and am grateful for the forums. It just bothers me that the only sort of gauge for a users reputation was taken away. The number of times you've posted doesn't really say how helpful you are.
I need to embrace the change!!!! The enchanting really is balanced now and Lapis is renewable with trading. I guess I was so used to using the Librarian's paper trade at the end to get emeralds but, according to the wiki, it won't work anymore. It mentioned that new trades that are replacements for old ones won't just replace them where they were in the queue but they will move to the end of the trading list. But I guess even that is workable...
Don't get me wrong, I love Minecraft. But this new update is making me uneasy only because of 3 things: villager trading, villager breeding, and enchanting. I know the new introductions balance out with trade-offs, but I really don't want to lose my villager breeder. I like everything else about the update; the armor stands, the new blocks, the fact that sheep are now awesome, and the killer bunny! It's the trading and breeding that's going to keep me on 1.7 for a while. I like that the trading has new things to trade with but the mechanics are all changed up. I think I'll update to 1.8 on a different profile and world and try it out that way, to see if I like it (I probably will).
0
How were horses confirmed? I haven't seen this. The only thing mentioned was a blip on the front of the news section that said 4J said horses were being added. 4J has not said that, ever. The only official mention was a tweet that said horses would be in a future update, that's it. What is this source everybody keeps referencing? I need to see this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
I completely agree. Getting a Like was significant and I liked to see where I got it and why, just as you said. But I do remember it was fairly easy to see how many Likes that individual had received. And I miss the different rankings you would get with the number of Likes you received, not to sound conceited or anything.
1
0
0
Anybody else remember? Help me out here.
0
That just proved my point. My suggestion, to have a smaller world, would take away from you. I'm all for suggestions that add but not the ones that reduce or take away. My original comment was for the OP. Why would the fortune enchantment need nurfing? That was my only question. And I understand that is just an opinion, no offense was given. And it goes back to the "enough" comment. Are we saying that we need limits for everyone? Not everyone can get lucky so just bring the bar down for everyone?
1
No, I found that out after the change. The extra step is a little inconvenient considering that we used to just be able to hover over someone's name anywhere and see their rep.
2
0
0