- Fishfish0001
- Retired Staff
-
Member for 12 years, 9 months, and 11 days
Last active Sat, Nov, 11 2017 13:19:04
- 4 Followers
- 528 Total Posts
- 271 Thanks
-
7
MCFUser8081245 posted a message on Facedesk moments (Forum edition)Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat -
6
Kaval posted a message on Best/Worst ReportsGuess who's doing their rounds?Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat
-
6
JohnTheRipper posted a message on PM box variety fun timeFirst I got these lovely PMs:Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat
After laughing my ass off for a few seconds, I read the other PM:
I'm not sure what I'll respond with, but this was fricking hilarious. -
5
Kokkuri posted a message on PM box variety fun timePosted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat -
7
Metadigital posted a message on Christmasification!It's back!Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat -
5
Koumus posted a message on Facedesk moments (Forum edition)Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat -
8
Akynth posted a message on PM box variety fun timeThis guy posted several duplicates of his topic. I cleaned up and informalled. Not only did he claim that it should be okay because he was spamming up multiple sections, not just one, but, well, read the last PM:Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat
Yep, that's me all right: being the pain in his ass today making sure he does what he's supposed to.
He says it like it's a bad thing. -
5
Beltir posted a message on Can a moderator receive an infraction?Posted in: Forum Discussion & Info
No, it is rare. Moderators are expected to understand and follow the rules, because otherwise how can we trust them to enforce the rules? -
7
Kaval posted a message on Facedesk moments (Forum edition)Posted in: Off topic, testing and misc. chat
Shut your gob -
2
Lord_Ralex posted a message on New Suspension SystemPosted in: Administrators & ModeratorsQuote from Kokkuri
So after reading it over a few times 1 pointers standalone should not suspend people yes? There's still the matter of some people's unexpired infractions though since I just dealt with an unexpired infraction suspending the user with 1 pointer.
Should work out in the future with new infractions from the sounds of it.
Urgh, reread it again and got confused. I'll get this eventually.
The principle that your first infraction point is suspension-free is still there. Just now instead of suspensions being completely based on the total, it is now based on the infraction given with the total only mattering to determine if it should be given.
1 points will at most give 3 regardless of the history. If they have 0 points when they start, they do not get a suspension. If they have 1-8 point to start, then they get 3 days.
Forumla:
if (total points after infraction >= 2)
days suspended = infraction points given * 3 - To post a comment, please login.
1
His signature says operated by professionals, his response makes him sound like a kid having a tantrum. Oh, and a little letter for letter? How much more ambiguous could I possibly have made that warning be?
Edit: Ralex beats down another host.
2
5
7
8
2
5
5
3
Yeah, why exclude tits?
4
He was flinging around nagger in a post.