I don't like the restricted movement, but are you one of those people who wears pants several sizes too small so they don't even reach your waist?
no...I try to keep 'em up. I'm not a gang-banger type. I get like 32 leg by 29 waist pants. I find that the tightness is more comfortable than baggy stuff rubbing on my legs.
no...I try to keep 'em up. I'm not a gang-banger type. I get like 32 leg by 29 waist pants. I find that the tightness is more comfortable than baggy stuff rubbing on my legs.
Oh thank god...
I see why that makes since, 34 legs 30 waist but I wear a 32 waist with a belt.
no...I try to keep 'em up. I'm not a gang-banger type. I get like 32 leg by 29 waist pants. I find that the tightness is more comfortable than baggy stuff rubbing on my legs.
I agree, I'm also one of the weirdos that thinks tighter clothes are more comfortable...
no...I try to keep 'em up. I'm not a gang-banger type. I get like 32 leg by 29 waist pants. I find that the tightness is more comfortable than baggy stuff rubbing on my legs.
I think I should clear this up. I get 32 leg by 29 waist b/c those proportions fit my physique perfectly. Any wider, they fall off. Even 1 inch less waist, painful. Stupid hip bones. What I lack in flab, I make up for in bone mass.
I think I should clear this up. I get 32 leg by 29 waist b/c those proportions fit my physique perfectly. Any wider, they fall off. Even 1 inch less waist, painful. Stupid hip bones. What I lack in flab, I make up for in bone mass.
29w by 34l would fit me perfectly, but such pants don't exist. I get by with 30w by 34l and just wear a belt all the time. I like the feel of a tight shirt, but I prefer to keep my legs free with somewhat baggy pants.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
This enlightening post brought to you courtesy of a serious overabundance of free time.
honestly, I find super skinny jeans comfortable. The wackier colors the better! *coughSALMONcough*
I don't like the restricted movement, but are you one of those people who wears pants several sizes too small so they don't even reach your waist?
no...I try to keep 'em up. I'm not a gang-banger type. I get like 32 leg by 29 waist pants. I find that the tightness is more comfortable than baggy stuff rubbing on my legs.
Oh thank god...
I see why that makes since, 34 legs 30 waist but I wear a 32 waist with a belt.
Pants poll, You're request has been granted... it's kinda creepy... you are a strange person...
Let's all get along... or something optimistic like that.
Even better, hooded robes. I wish I had one of those....
You have only scratched the surface...
It is because of people like you I sleep with a machete under my pillow.
Damn you forum only allowing two lines in the signature.
- Thank you slimes.
Whats wrong with basketball shorts?
I don't know, I just wanted an excuse to mention the fact i have a machete under my pillow...
Depends. Do you actually play a lot of Basketball or do you just wear the clothes?
I agree, I'm also one of the weirdos that thinks tighter clothes are more comfortable...
*Makes J with fingers.
I think I should clear this up. I get 32 leg by 29 waist b/c those proportions fit my physique perfectly. Any wider, they fall off. Even 1 inch less waist, painful. Stupid hip bones. What I lack in flab, I make up for in bone mass.
29w by 34l would fit me perfectly, but such pants don't exist. I get by with 30w by 34l and just wear a belt all the time. I like the feel of a tight shirt, but I prefer to keep my legs free with somewhat baggy pants.