USP .45
AR-15
Kel-tec SU-16
Mosin Nagant
Mossberg M500
1858 Remington Army Reproduction in .44
Nice collection. I like the USP, a bit pricy though. I thought about getting a .45 I went for the 9mm for the cheaper ammo. The Sigma gets a bad rap, but it's actually a pretty nice gun. It desperately needs trigger work, but that was easy enough for me to do at home. I've been dying to get my Mosin out to the range but I want to make sure I it well cleaned out. I was surprised to find out how cheap the ammo was for it, a dollar cheaper than .223 for 20 rounds.
Nice collection. I like the USP, a bit pricy though. I thought about getting a .45 I went for the 9mm for the cheaper ammo. The Sigma gets a bad rap, but it's actually a pretty nice gun. It desperately needs trigger work, but that was easy enough for me to do at home. I've been dying to get my Mosin out to the range but I want to make sure I it well cleaned out. I was surprised to find out how cheap the ammo was for it, a dollar cheaper than .223 for 20 rounds.
Thanks, yeah the ammo is cheap. Do you know how I might be able to adjust the front sight on the mosin? Mine is crooked and misses by about three inches at 50 yards.
Thanks, yeah the ammo is cheap. Do you know how I might be able to adjust the front sight on the mosin? Mine is crooked and misses by about three inches at 50 yards.
You can use a hammer and punch to adjust it side to side, but that's about it.
I'm not very old, so I don't know a lot of guns, but I do like the CalTech Sub2000.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Why you be a minen' in me mines? If you need to contact me, a private message is the way to go. I almost never come back to a topic after I've commented on it.
My old Winchester .22 scoped is all i need. If i need to take down something thats too big for a .22, there's a problem. .22 is fine for all the things i'll encounter. (zombies, rabid dogs, people ect)
I like guns, but only in games. I do not support killing people in real life, - who would?
The question of this thread was not about if you support the killing of people. For crying out loud dude, i was asking if you had a favorite one or not. Just because we like guns doesn't make us killers. Lol, if a zombie apocalypse would happen what would you do then?
Honestly, wars don't necessarily have anything to do with this. If 2 countries are gonna have a war they'll equip their armies with what ever they can get their hands on. Guns helped tremendously in both wars and thanks to John Browning the Allied powers won, or do you still wish for a 1000 year Reich?
I think an M4A1 with a Trijicon TA44-4 ACOG, Surefire FA556-212 suppressor, Olight M20S tactical flashlight, and a UTG foregrip is probably the best SOPMOD look out there. For a pistol, it defiantly have to be a SIG P226.
i hope you realize that world war 1 had nothing to do with the third reich? it was just one of europeans biggest wars.
also, germany proberly lost the war thank to its lack of proper command and loss in trust of the monarch (which after the war. got ditched and the weihmar republic emerged).
and also. the russian won ww2.
Who said WWI had anything to do with the third Reich? There were three of them, hence third.
The Russians didn't win WWII, Germany lost because it couldn't sustain a war on two fronts, amongst other things. There are no winners in war.
Also, you should realize that there have been many bloody wars, not all of them fought with guns. War has been around for much longer than gunpowder. Frankly, I don't know what you're trying to say. You say guns are bad then point to the World Wars. What's your point? Guns are not the reason for war, or crime.
i hope you realize that world war 1 had nothing to do with the third reich? it was just one of europeans biggest wars.
also, germany proberly lost the war thank to its lack of proper command and loss in trust of the monarch (which after the war. got ditched and the weihmar republic emerged).
and also. the russian won ww2.
The ALLIED Powers won WW2, just because they beat us to Berlin doesn't mean they won it. And when i mentioned the Reich i wasn't talking about WW1, Germany had some of the greatest generals of all time, Hitlers Blitzkrieg strategy was simple but effective, Erwin Rommel or the "Desert Fox" pretty much ruled the tank scene for quite a while. That is until Patton showed up. The reason they lost was because they were surrounded on all sides, Germany's allies were all gone except for Japan, after the Battle of the Bulge they were done for and had no way of recovering.
no. but they make war a lot more deadly with a lot more casualties.
also. the russian would have won the war without intervention of the allies eventually.
Yes, because a bullet is much more deadly than an axe in your skull. You can't get more dead than dead. And how do you know the Russians would have won? Do you have a crystal ball?
except an axe to your skull doesnt have the capability to shoot a 1.000 rounds per minute.
Except that's irrelevant. Before there were guns, nobody had guns. They all ran toward each other with sharpened pieces of metal and cut each other to pieces. How is that any better than fighting with guns?
no. but they make war a lot more deadly with a lot more casualties.
also. the russian would have won the war without intervention of the allies eventually.
HaHa, No. The Russians were being pounded into the ground. Great Britain was being shat on all day by the Luftwaffe. If it wasn't for the Americans helping out both of those countries would still be a wreck today.
Nice collection. I like the USP, a bit pricy though. I thought about getting a .45 I went for the 9mm for the cheaper ammo. The Sigma gets a bad rap, but it's actually a pretty nice gun. It desperately needs trigger work, but that was easy enough for me to do at home. I've been dying to get my Mosin out to the range but I want to make sure I it well cleaned out. I was surprised to find out how cheap the ammo was for it, a dollar cheaper than .223 for 20 rounds.
Thanks, yeah the ammo is cheap. Do you know how I might be able to adjust the front sight on the mosin? Mine is crooked and misses by about three inches at 50 yards.
You can use a hammer and punch to adjust it side to side, but that's about it.
Yeah, I was starting to think that. I was hoping for something more...precise.
Happy day! I have an AK on the way.
If you need to contact me, a private message is the way to go. I almost never come back to a topic after I've commented on it.
Just because they are used by criminals means you will never use one?
The question of this thread was not about if you support the killing of people. For crying out loud dude, i was asking if you had a favorite one or not. Just because we like guns doesn't make us killers. Lol, if a zombie apocalypse would happen what would you do then?
Honestly, wars don't necessarily have anything to do with this. If 2 countries are gonna have a war they'll equip their armies with what ever they can get their hands on. Guns helped tremendously in both wars and thanks to John Browning the Allied powers won, or do you still wish for a 1000 year Reich?
Thats more than two attachments! /codfag
NECKBEERD FORUM
Guns can have more than 2 attachments.
Who said WWI had anything to do with the third Reich? There were three of them, hence third.
The Russians didn't win WWII, Germany lost because it couldn't sustain a war on two fronts, amongst other things. There are no winners in war.
Also, you should realize that there have been many bloody wars, not all of them fought with guns. War has been around for much longer than gunpowder. Frankly, I don't know what you're trying to say. You say guns are bad then point to the World Wars. What's your point? Guns are not the reason for war, or crime.
The ALLIED Powers won WW2, just because they beat us to Berlin doesn't mean they won it. And when i mentioned the Reich i wasn't talking about WW1, Germany had some of the greatest generals of all time, Hitlers Blitzkrieg strategy was simple but effective, Erwin Rommel or the "Desert Fox" pretty much ruled the tank scene for quite a while. That is until Patton showed up. The reason they lost was because they were surrounded on all sides, Germany's allies were all gone except for Japan, after the Battle of the Bulge they were done for and had no way of recovering.
Yes, because a bullet is much more deadly than an axe in your skull. You can't get more dead than dead. And how do you know the Russians would have won? Do you have a crystal ball?
Except that's irrelevant. Before there were guns, nobody had guns. They all ran toward each other with sharpened pieces of metal and cut each other to pieces. How is that any better than fighting with guns?
Hehehe
NECKBEERD FORUM
HaHa, No. The Russians were being pounded into the ground. Great Britain was being shat on all day by the Luftwaffe. If it wasn't for the Americans helping out both of those countries would still be a wreck today.
Only if you buy me one too.