Does nobody here do any art besides drawing? There are plenty other kinds of art, like sculpting, painting, coding can even be seen as an art, ANYTHING!
I'm the only person so far who has shown examples of my work which wasn't drawings.
I've done personal coding projects from little games to hack files for larger games, sprites and different things of the like, if that counts.
The first image is a bit too strange for me, but the shark is superb. I'd rate you at least a 7.
I do plenty of drawing in pencil and I'd like to think I'm pretty good at art. So I think i'm a 7.5 I can do realistic drawings but cartoons are my real forte. I'm also pretty good at poster design and the like. I love digital art but I've only had a chance to do it at school as I do not have photoshop on my own computer.
As for paintings? I'm horrible. Sculpting, collages, murials, I suck.
People are rating themselves pretty high on here, especially for some of the work being produced. Not trying to sound like an ass or anything, especially since I haven't posted a picture yet (I'm working on it).
From this scale on 1-10, I'm assuming 1 is 'cannot draw at all', 10 is 'Da Vinci status' and 5 is 'average'.
People are rating themselves pretty high on here, especially for some of the work being produced. Not trying to sound like an ass or anything, especially since I haven't posted a picture yet (I'm working on it).
From this scale on 1-10, I'm assuming 1 is 'cannot draw at all', 10 is 'Da Vinci status' and 5 is 'average'.
In that case, I'm gonne rate myself a 5 or six instead. >_>
People are rating themselves pretty high on here, especially for some of the work being produced. Not trying to sound like an ass or anything, especially since I haven't posted a picture yet (I'm working on it).
From this scale on 1-10, I'm assuming 1 is 'cannot draw at all', 10 is 'Da Vinci status' and 5 is 'average'.
RThat's what I was trying to say earlier. 5 should be the mean, but people are acting like 7 is. In fact, it would probably be closer to 8 in terms of average response score considering all the people being unserious now.
IMPORTANT NOTE: This is not DeviantArt, this thread is not to give out asspats to people who think that their ego isn't big enough.
If you know that you are a pretty good artist than do not post a pic saying "OMG I suk so much >_>!" hoping for someone to lend you a proverbial hand on the back and tell you that you are good.
If they think that they will say so without you prodding them.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"May god have mercy on my enemies, because I will not." - George S. Patton
Well, according to the OP if you can draw something bulkier than a stick figure you are automatically entitled to a 6 or more, so the scale being unbalanced is a mistake on his part.
We said 5 is an average person who can draw some stick people killing each other. Anything above that which doesn't look like it was done in MS paint in five minutes is a 6, of course, because that is a little more refined. From there it is a matter of opinion really, and people can judge it how they want.
I am still looking for a mistake in that logic. Having trouble finding one.
IMPORTANT NOTE: This is not DeviantArt, this thread is not to give out asspats to people who think that their ego isn't big enough.
If you know that you are a pretty good artist than do not post a pic saying "OMG I suk so much >_>!" hoping for someone to lend you a proverbial hand on the back and tell you that you are good.
If they think that they will say so without you prodding them.
I believe that's actually a technique, always underrate yourself and citisize so it is easier to push yourself to do better.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
join off topic IRC at #otter on esper.net, there is cake*
*there may or may not be cake
We said 5 is an average person who can draw some stick people killing each other. Anything above that which doesn't look like it was done in MS paint in five minutes is a 6, of course, because that is a little more refined. From there it is a matter of opinion really, and people can judge it how they want.
I am still looking for a mistake in that logic. Having trouble finding one.
I'd have to say that I'm maybe a 7-7.5. But I generally don't draw-I'm a painter. I'd be happy to give you guys a glimpse of some of my paintings when I once more have access to a digital camera.
I vary. With structures and landscapes I'm probably an 8, but with people and animals I'm closer to a 5. I don't have enough practice with anatomy to claim to be able to do it very well.
We said 5 is an average person who can draw some stick people killing each other. Anything above that which doesn't look like it was done in MS paint in five minutes is a 6, of course, because that is a little more refined. From there it is a matter of opinion really, and people can judge it how they want.
I am still looking for a mistake in that logic. Having trouble finding one.
5 is stick figures? Hate to see what 1 and 2 are. just squiggly lines on a sheet of lined paper?
On that scale I am about an 8 (+-.6).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
join off topic IRC at #otter on esper.net, there is cake*
*there may or may not be cake
Personally I think I rank around 7, maybe more, maybe less.
Example:
This one is going to need some explaining: it was drawn after looking at the front page for DA and seeing nothing but over saturated "original" characters again. Of course, trying to get it through the artist's heads that their characters are nothing but copyright infringements with a new color scheme and a few ridiculous addons will make you a troll and will get you reported.
I've done personal coding projects from little games to hack files for larger games, sprites and different things of the like, if that counts.
Lol at abraham linkin. :tongue.gif:
Your mystical dragon magic comic is better! xD
It's a good idea to draw something from scratch, rather than copying another image exactly. That's the exact same pose as official pokemon art.
Thank you, come again!
so beautiful<3
Thank you, come again!
The first image is a bit too strange for me, but the shark is superb. I'd rate you at least a 7.
I do plenty of drawing in pencil and I'd like to think I'm pretty good at art. So I think i'm a 7.5 I can do realistic drawings but cartoons are my real forte. I'm also pretty good at poster design and the like. I love digital art but I've only had a chance to do it at school as I do not have photoshop on my own computer.
As for paintings? I'm horrible. Sculpting, collages, murials, I suck.
That was from getting bored in school (When I went to school, that picture is OLD), then pulling up a picture to draw.
I got a few others too, But I still fail at coloring. ~sob~
I have a picture I drew from clear memory of a picture I saw on the pc, but its on my mom's pc, so I gotta wait till tonight to show it. >_<
From this scale on 1-10, I'm assuming 1 is 'cannot draw at all', 10 is 'Da Vinci status' and 5 is 'average'.
In that case, I'm gonne rate myself a 5 or six instead. >_>
RThat's what I was trying to say earlier. 5 should be the mean, but people are acting like 7 is. In fact, it would probably be closer to 8 in terms of average response score considering all the people being unserious now.
You heard that, green and red.
If you know that you are a pretty good artist than do not post a pic saying "OMG I suk so much >_>!" hoping for someone to lend you a proverbial hand on the back and tell you that you are good.
If they think that they will say so without you prodding them.
We said 5 is an average person who can draw some stick people killing each other. Anything above that which doesn't look like it was done in MS paint in five minutes is a 6, of course, because that is a little more refined. From there it is a matter of opinion really, and people can judge it how they want.
I am still looking for a mistake in that logic. Having trouble finding one.
I believe that's actually a technique, always underrate yourself and citisize so it is easier to push yourself to do better.
*there may or may not be cake
There is a difference between being a perfectionist and shamelessly begging for attention over the internet.
Why does Pikachu have only one eye, and an empty eye-socket? You could have at least given him an eye-patch...
I'd have to say that I'm maybe a 7-7.5. But I generally don't draw-I'm a painter. I'd be happy to give you guys a glimpse of some of my paintings when I once more have access to a digital camera.
I don't really have any art online, though.
5 is stick figures? Hate to see what 1 and 2 are. just squiggly lines on a sheet of lined paper?
On that scale I am about an 8 (+-.6).
*there may or may not be cake
Example:
This one is going to need some explaining: it was drawn after looking at the front page for DA and seeing nothing but over saturated "original" characters again. Of course, trying to get it through the artist's heads that their characters are nothing but copyright infringements with a new color scheme and a few ridiculous addons will make you a troll and will get you reported.
So I drew this and left the site.