As I've said before, you don't go to see Final Destination movies to see a well-developed, well-thought out plot with great acting.
You go to see ridiculous over-the-top rube-goldberg-esque death sequences.
It's an interesting premise, but they kind of ruined it by making the sequels all exactly the same as the first one. If they changed it up a bit more than just changing what the accident was at the beginning and how each person dies, it might be halfway decent. Hell, the second one had a whole plotline about how Death's plan got screwed up as a result of the first movie, and a new life could unravel the new one.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"The war...has begun."
Want to know more? Check out the beginnings of my novel, Chronicles of Light, at Figment.com. Latest update: Chapter 1: Life of a Thief.
As I've said before, you don't go to see Final Destination movies to see a well-developed, well-thought out plot with great acting.
You go to see ridiculous over-the-top rube-goldberg-esque death sequences.
It's an interesting premise, but they kind of ruined it by making the sequels all exactly the same as the first one. If they changed it up a bit more than just changing what the accident was at the beginning and how each person dies, it might be halfway decent. Hell, the second one had a whole plotline about how Death's plan got screwed up as a result of the first movie, and a new life could unravel the new one.
My favorite was the one where the girls died in the tanning beds. That was just because they had nice tits though. haha
I think this series is a lot like Saw, in the way that, when you watch the first one, for the first time, and have no idea what is going to happen, it's freakin awesome.
But after that it just looses it's attraction because they're all just the same.
And I rated the first one 4 star, cos it was good, but I have seen better. [cough]Fightclub[/cough]
Nice relation. It is alot like the Saw series in that they are all the same concept, just different versions.
The acting is terrible. The story is formulaic. There's nothing really interesting as far as the plot. No discussion of death. No new interesting concepts. Lots of fluff in the form of false kills. And the entire film from the opening credits to the closing credits is about the methods in which these people die.
Many good things come from Sweden, like minecraft and.... umm.... did i alredy say minecraft?
if u put redstone in jukebox, will it play redzone?
You go to see ridiculous over-the-top rube-goldberg-esque death sequences.
It's an interesting premise, but they kind of ruined it by making the sequels all exactly the same as the first one. If they changed it up a bit more than just changing what the accident was at the beginning and how each person dies, it might be halfway decent. Hell, the second one had a whole plotline about how Death's plan got screwed up as a result of the first movie, and a new life could unravel the new one.
Want to know more? Check out the beginnings of my novel, Chronicles of Light, at Figment.com. Latest update: Chapter 1: Life of a Thief.
My favorite was the one where the girls died in the tanning beds. That was just because they had nice tits though. haha
Nice relation. It is alot like the Saw series in that they are all the same concept, just different versions.