All Zelda games are the same, but so are Call of Duty games.
??? How? With each (major) one they've changed up the art style comepletely, and taken out some weapons and put new ones in, they put new puzzles in, most characters don't even return from past games, they write new music, I mean the only thing that stays the same is somewhat of the gameplay, and even at that they change up the controls, the master sword is actually absent in a lot of them. I mean do you mean that you can find faries in all of them? That health is represented by hearts in all of them? I'm sorry but I just don't get that post...
What don't you like about Halo? It's much better than CoD. Or do you just not prefer FPS in general?
i dont mind fps games its just that cod and halo are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OVERRATED id be at school and id say"hey did you guys get the new zelda game and theyd say" whats zelda? i play halo "
All Zelda games are the same, but so are Call of Duty games.
Bull
The stories between each game, the characters, the puzzles, even the gameplay has changed completely from the original NES title to Skyward sword.
From this:
To this:
If that isn't change I don't know what is.
More importantly, every Zelda title has a personality all it's own, Each is it's own distinct world.
They are an experience rather than just a game.
COD is the same thing every time because the literally make BARELY NOTICEABLE changes in each game. Add a few guns here and there, OH NOW WE'RE IN WW2.
The stories between each game, the characters, the puzzles, even the gameplay has changed completely from the original NES title to Skyward sword.
From this:
To this:
If that isn't change I don't know what is.
More importantly, every Zelda title has a personality all it's own, Each is it's own distinct world.
They are an experience rather than just a game.
COD is the same thing every time because the literally make BARELY NOTICEABLE changes in each game. Add a few guns here and there, OH NOW WE'RE IN WW2.
No gameplay changes or innovation whatsoever.
Oh OH my turn!!
Now im going to be honest if the last one is not MW3 I wouldn't be surprised I cannot for the life of me see any difference..
People who just prefer FPS games to RPGs. Some people just don't like them, so naturally they'l choose Cod. I can't even understand why these series are being compared, the only things they have in common is that they have similar abbreviations (CoD, LoZ)
i dont mind fps games its just that cod and halo are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OVERRATED id be at school and id say"hey did you guys get the new zelda game and theyd say" whats zelda? i play halo "
THATS WHY I HATE IT
CoD maybe, but no way is Halo overrated, it's one of the best FPSs out there. If you think it's overrated then you most certainly do mind FPSs (or you're just one of those idiots who just thinks they're sophisticated because they play games out of the mainstream).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
No, there has never, ever been a sandbox game with a story or ending... except Grand Theft Auto... and Saints Row... and Red Dead Redemption... and Crack Down... and Assassins Creed...
The stories between each game, the characters, the puzzles, even the gameplay has changed completely from the original NES title to Skyward sword.
From this:
-snip-
To this:
-snip-
If that isn't change I don't know what is.
More importantly, every Zelda title has a personality all it's own, Each is it's own distinct world.
They are an experience rather than just a game.
COD is the same thing every time because the literally make BARELY NOTICEABLE changes in each game. Add a few guns here and there, OH NOW WE'RE IN WW2.
No gameplay changes or innovation whatsoever.
Exactly, they're not even all 3d, they're set in different time-lines, have different art styles, characters with personality, new items while keeping the neccesary items to keep it a series, it now has music from an orchistra, not to mention it actually has a story I want to listen to...
Are you seriously implying you have to be a stupid 10 year old to enjoy Call of Duty more than Zelda? Can everybody put aside their elitist attitudes and realize that people have different opinions?
You should totally check out Fallout series, there amazing. or BF3 which is awesome too but only for PC because its more supperior.
FALLOUT for the win.
OT: Zelda, because most Zelda games are similar, but more different than CoD games. Which are basically the same game with more-balanced multiplayer, a few graphical changes, and a brand-new 30-minute "campaign".
I don't really like Zelda. I like CoD. Problem, fanboys? I don't give a damn about what you think. And don't say I'm a "stupid kid", I'm a 33 year old man.
??? How? With each (major) one they've changed up the art style comepletely, and taken out some weapons and put new ones in, they put new puzzles in, most characters don't even return from past games, they write new music, I mean the only thing that stays the same is somewhat of the gameplay, and even at that they change up the controls, the master sword is actually absent in a lot of them. I mean do you mean that you can find faries in all of them? That health is represented by hearts in all of them? I'm sorry but I just don't get that post...
Zelda 100%
i dont mind fps games its just that cod and halo are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OVERRATED id be at school and id say"hey did you guys get the new zelda game and theyd say" whats zelda? i play halo "
THATS WHY I HATE IT
So beautiful :')
Zelda > COD babbys any day.
Bull
The stories between each game, the characters, the puzzles, even the gameplay has changed completely from the original NES title to Skyward sword.
From this:
To this:
If that isn't change I don't know what is.
More importantly, every Zelda title has a personality all it's own, Each is it's own distinct world.
They are an experience rather than just a game.
COD is the same thing every time because the literally make BARELY NOTICEABLE changes in each game. Add a few guns here and there, OH NOW WE'RE IN WW2.
No gameplay changes or innovation whatsoever.
Oh OH my turn!!
Now im going to be honest if the last one is not MW3 I wouldn't be surprised I cannot for the life of me see any difference..
People who just prefer FPS games to RPGs. Some people just don't like them, so naturally they'l choose Cod. I can't even understand why these series are being compared, the only things they have in common is that they have similar abbreviations (CoD, LoZ)
CoD maybe, but no way is Halo overrated, it's one of the best FPSs out there. If you think it's overrated then you most certainly do mind FPSs (or you're just one of those idiots who just thinks they're sophisticated because they play games out of the mainstream).
Help us at soartex.net!
Exactly, they're not even all 3d, they're set in different time-lines, have different art styles, characters with personality, new items while keeping the neccesary items to keep it a series, it now has music from an orchistra, not to mention it actually has a story I want to listen to...
"If along the way you find friends 'n they're good, they'll be good if not it's life, that's what happens"
Are you seriously implying you have to be a stupid 10 year old to enjoy Call of Duty more than Zelda? Can everybody put aside their elitist attitudes and realize that people have different opinions?
With that said, I prefer Zelda.
The most classic RPG game I ever played...
Good memories, and I still have the game on my NES and GBA emulator.
FALLOUT for the win.
OT: Zelda, because most Zelda games are similar, but more different than CoD games. Which are basically the same game with more-balanced multiplayer, a few graphical changes, and a brand-new 30-minute "campaign".
Are you really comparing two entirely different genres of games?