Yes, most monitors do.
Though you may be able to overclock the monitor a bit if you have an nvidia card and it may show more than 60.
Some monitors come pre- overclocked and can show 75 / 85 /120 / 144 fps. ( some tv's have 240 hz refresh rate )
Also, do you really want a touchscreen, i honestly don't think touchscreen is worth it yet.
Is there a large difference between 60fps and 120fps? I can currently get 120 fps on my desktop, so will it be very different with only 60?
Some people can tell the difference, some people could care less. Your desktop right now probably has a 60 hz monitor so if you are fine with that then no need to go higher.
If you want my opinion, i can tell the difference and i do prefer higher refresh rates. (since i have a 144hz monitor and a 60 hz one.)
Well... depending on what monitor ur using now you might notice. The big old monitors in my house are normally like 80hz (80fps) and urs might be too, so when u drop back down to 60 fps you might notice it to be a little unsmooth but ull get used to it. Besides that its not worth the extra money for a 120hz monitor
No. We have gone through this numerous times already. Due to how your eye and brain perceive motion and how your eye "sees" light, you do not tell any difference, since you are always staring at a "still", "moving" image.
No. We have gone through this numerous times already. Due to how your eye and brain perceive motion and how your eye "sees" light, you do not tell any difference, since you are always staring at a "still", "moving" image.
Sorry but I can tell the difference. Have you ever used one?
Sorry but I can tell the difference. Have you ever used one?
Yes, I have one sitting right in front of me, and a 60hz right next to it.
We have been through this already. Science says you cannot see a difference, if you are seeing one you are only seeing what you want to see. We had a whole three threads about this cluster and all ended the same way, we came to this conclusion.
Yes, I have one sitting right in front of me, and a 60hz right next to it.
We have been through this already. Science says you cannot see a difference, if you are seeing one you are only seeing what you want to see. We had a whole three threads about this cluster and all ended the same way, we came to this conclusion.
End of discussion.
You can't say "Science says this" and expect people to believe it's true. Science can be used to provide evidence for something, but not say it's true.
Who knows, there could have been a fatal error in the experiments. Maybe the human eye really can see more than 60 FPS.
You can't say "Science says this" and expect people to believe it's true. Science can be used to provide evidence for something, but not say it's true.
Who knows, there could have been a fatal error in the experiments. Maybe the human eye really can see more than 60 FPS.
Except we have been through this already, it cannot:
What you are actually seeing is the FPS fluxuation, not the difference between 60fps and 120fps, but the difference between a steady 60fps and a variable 60-120fps.
Again, end of discussion. Do not continue this off topic conversation.
What you are actually seeing is the FPS fluxuation, not the difference between 60fps and 120fps, but the difference between a steady 60fps and a variable 60-120fps.
Again, end of discussion. Do not continue this off topic conversation.
Today I was looking for a monitor, and I really liked the Acer T232HL. However, I read somewhere that it can only show 60 fps. Is this true?
Though you may be able to overclock the monitor a bit if you have an nvidia card and it may show more than 60.
Some monitors come pre- overclocked and can show 75 / 85 /120 / 144 fps. ( some tv's have 240 hz refresh rate )
Also, do you really want a touchscreen, i honestly don't think touchscreen is worth it yet.
If you want my opinion, i can tell the difference and i do prefer higher refresh rates. (since i have a 144hz monitor and a 60 hz one.)
No. We have gone through this numerous times already. Due to how your eye and brain perceive motion and how your eye "sees" light, you do not tell any difference, since you are always staring at a "still", "moving" image.
We have been through this already. Science says you cannot see a difference, if you are seeing one you are only seeing what you want to see. We had a whole three threads about this cluster and all ended the same way, we came to this conclusion.
End of discussion.
You can't say "Science says this" and expect people to believe it's true. Science can be used to provide evidence for something, but not say it's true.
Who knows, there could have been a fatal error in the experiments. Maybe the human eye really can see more than 60 FPS.
http://www.100fps.co..._humans_see.htm
http://www.newton.de...01/gen01025.htm
http://skeptics.stac...tes-above-60-hz
http://www.cameratec...e-can-perceive/
What you are actually seeing is the FPS fluxuation, not the difference between 60fps and 120fps, but the difference between a steady 60fps and a variable 60-120fps.
Again, end of discussion. Do not continue this off topic conversation.
Good job completely missing my point.