Actually with APUs it is more like 15 FPS or more.
The speed of memory barley makes a difference. Without the higher speed memory, you would from 60 to 75 the way you put it. And even then, it's not needed as you already have as much fps as you need.
Actually with APUs it is more like 15 FPS or more.
The speed of memory barley makes a difference. Without the higher speed memory, you would from 60 to 75 the way you put it. And even then, it's not needed as you already have as much fps as you need.
The speed of memory barley makes a difference. Without the higher speed memory, you would from 60 to 75 the way you put it. And even then, it's not needed as you already have as much fps as you need.
We've already discussed that ram upgrades on an APU do make a difference, but will not make a 15 frame difference. Going from 1333mhz to 1600mhz is the first actual improvement (something like 4fps gain). And then the next worthwhile improvement will be at 2400mhz, which is out of budget.
In fact, if you're looking to squeeze some more performance out of an apu, overclocking the iGPU inside is a great way to do that. You have to remember to overclock the cpu and northbridge as well, so that you don't create bottlenecks anywhere. In my opinion, this is best achieved by setting everything to stock, and then slowly bumping cpu, igpu, and nb, up all at the same time, until you get to an unstable machine, then bring the clocks down until you reach stable levels again.
We've already discussed that ram upgrades on an APU do make a difference, but will not make a 15 frame difference. Going from 1333mhz to 1600mhz is the first actual improvement (something like 4fps gain). And then the next worthwhile improvement will be at 2400mhz, which is out of budget.
Uh, which game are we even talking about? One with a base framerate of 3 FPS on 1333 memory?
You're just wrong in regards to memory scaling with Kaveri and Richland, reputable hardware sites have done multiple tests and found that performance massively improves moving from 1333 to 1866, let alone low-latency 2133.
I have every right to argue, and even jp & John agress that there is a difference between speeds on APUS. Why are you trying to act superior exactly? Am I so inferior that I am not allowed to argue?
Who said anything about superiority? i just find it annoying that every post you make is always arguing about something very small that doesnt really even matter its just a tiny damn frame boost why dont you try to make a build with your "frame boost" under $400
I'd like to point out that there's no reason to get an apu when he can afford the gtx650. I don't know why you're all still arguing.
The 650 is roughly equal to or worse than the 7750, no? If so, there's little to no performance difference once faster memory is used. (At least with Kaveri)
The 650 is roughly equal to or worse than the 7750, no? If so, there's little to no performance difference once faster memory is used. (At least with Kaveri)
It is not that much more expensive. http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gskill-memory-f32400c11d8gxm
Yes like $15 dollars over. Or you can get this one that is just a little over budget. http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gskill-memory-f32133c10d8gsr
Or you can not go over budget by trying to gain 2 frames
My YouTube Channel --->https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM70mQPHXT9RC8skS5pK6Vg
Actually with APUs it is more like 15 FPS or more.
The speed of memory barley makes a difference. Without the higher speed memory, you would from 60 to 75 the way you put it. And even then, it's not needed as you already have as much fps as you need.
The speed of memory barley makes a difference. Without the higher speed memory, you would from 60 to 75 the way you put it. And even then, it's not needed as you already have as much fps as you need.
My YouTube Channel --->https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM70mQPHXT9RC8skS5pK6Vg
On APUs they make a big difference.
We've already discussed that ram upgrades on an APU do make a difference, but will not make a 15 frame difference. Going from 1333mhz to 1600mhz is the first actual improvement (something like 4fps gain). And then the next worthwhile improvement will be at 2400mhz, which is out of budget.
Uh, which game are we even talking about? One with a base framerate of 3 FPS on 1333 memory?
You're just wrong in regards to memory scaling with Kaveri and Richland, reputable hardware sites have done multiple tests and found that performance massively improves moving from 1333 to 1866, let alone low-latency 2133.
Who said anything about superiority? i just find it annoying that every post you make is always arguing about something very small that doesnt really even matter its just a tiny damn frame boost why dont you try to make a build with your "frame boost" under $400
PSU: Corsair CX600M
STEAM
Also remember the original had RAM @ 1333 MHz. So it is going to be a bigger improvement.
The 650 is roughly equal to or worse than the 7750, no? If so, there's little to no performance difference once faster memory is used. (At least with Kaveri)
Well, no. http://www.hwcompare.com/13468/geforce-gtx-650-vs-radeon-hd-7750/
Comparing from a real source would show that they are indeed about equal.