Since you're here, was that you that thought up the ranking system for suggestions? Regardless, I think that's something we should put time into. Can that be discussed here or should that stick to the mega-PM prior to this guide being made?
Either or I suppose, but I want to stress now and throughout the process (if we get into discussion on it), that it would be for rating the amount of effort put into a suggestion, not for the quality of the idea itself. My biggest concern is people using it and arbitrarily rating an idea poorly just because they forgot a mob stat or didn't use pictures, instead of focusing on the idea itself.
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
it would be for rating the amount of effort put into a suggestion, not for the quality of the idea itself.
My biggest concern is people using it and arbitrarily rating an idea poorly just because they forgot a mob stat or didn't use pictures, instead of focusing on the idea itself.
These two statements seem contradictory. Can you elaborate on this? It's the first I've heard of this, but I don't think I'll like it.
These two statements seem contradictory. Can you elaborate on this? It's the first I've heard of this, but I don't think I'll like it.
The idea was to include in this guide for structuring an idea on things that make your suggestion look better and give people more to discuss. This is what I originally wrote as a concept:
Iron - These things would be the base requirements for writing a decent suggestion, that everyone should be able to include. Examples:
Descriptive title: Actually describing the idea in some amount with the title, not saying "Mojang add this to next version pls!"
Formatting: Not using a hard to read font color like white or bright yellow
Crafting recipe for crafted items: They are easy to make and basically a necessity
Spelling/Grammar: Even though we need to acknowledge that nobody is expecting flawless spelling or grammar, things like not only using text-speak like "U guise will luv dis, it is l33t."
Gold - Things that go above the basic Iron-level of content, but isn't required. Examples:
Exact stats for mobs: Usually some rough estimates are fine, but this would be like detailing damage on each difficulty level, things like that
Formatting: Stylish use of bold, italics, underlines, and different font sizes to make it easier to read and digest, like consistent styles for section titles or things like that
Images: Adding a banner, pictures of the mob or block, etc.
Diamond - Anything that would fall into the Overachiever's guide basically. Examples:
Detailed Mob AI: Not just saying hostile/passive, and beyond saying how it attacks. How it lives and breathes in the world (if like the current Minecraft mobs, awkwardly and stupidly I suppose)
Extras: Getting a mod made, mob sounds, full dimension shots using a resource pack, stuff like that
Coal - Things you want to avoid. Examples:
Addressing Mojang directly (or worse, Notch): We've all seen the people who think this a direct line to Mojang, it wouldn't hurt to remind them it isn't
"It can be optional" and other silly excuses
Taking constructive criticism as a personal attack: Because while it should be obvious, somehow it isn't apparently.
The idea is to make it solely about how you present the idea, and not about the idea itself. The problem is people might want to use it to give feedback instead and say a really smart idea is automatically "Coal" level because they address Mojang directly, or say that an extremely bad idea (like... invisible Creepers that can see you from 1000 blocks away and go through walls) is good just because they made a mod for it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
To a certain degree I like the concept, but I honestly think it could be just better put as a list of good things to do and things to avoid. Having a ranking system like this can easily get confusing or arbitrary (like the MPAA's movie rating system) if not done well, and there's not really a need to make a well-done system for this.
To a certain degree I like the concept, but I honestly think it could be just better put as a list of good things to do and things to avoid. Having a ranking system like this can easily get confusing or arbitrary (like the MPAA's movie rating system) if not done well, and there's not really a need to make a well-done system for this.
Yeah I agree for the most part, it is kind of arbitrary on what each level has (except Coal and Iron, as basic things to have or avoid are obvious, but somehow not obvious to people making suggestions). I think that is why we never did it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
The idea was to include in this guide for structuring an idea on things that make your suggestion look better and give people more to discuss. This is what I originally wrote as a concept:
Iron - These things would be the base requirements for writing a decent suggestion, that everyone should be able to include. Examples:
Descriptive title: Actually describing the idea in some amount with the title, not saying "Mojang add this to next version pls!"
Formatting: Not using a hard to read font color like white or bright yellow
Crafting recipe for crafted items: They are easy to make and basically a necessity
Spelling/Grammar: Even though we need to acknowledge that nobody is expecting flawless spelling or grammar, things like not only using text-speak like "U guise will luv dis, it is l33t."
Gold - Things that go above the basic Iron-level of content, but isn't required. Examples:
Exact stats for mobs: Usually some rough estimates are fine, but this would be like detailing damage on each difficulty level, things like that
Formatting: Stylish use of bold, italics, underlines, and different font sizes to make it easier to read and digest, like consistent styles for section titles or things like that
Images: Adding a banner, pictures of the mob or block, etc.
Diamond - Anything that would fall into the Overachiever's guide basically. Examples:
Detailed Mob AI: Not just saying hostile/passive, and beyond saying how it attacks. How it lives and breathes in the world (if like the current Minecraft mobs, awkwardly and stupidly I suppose)
Extras: Getting a mod made, mob sounds, full dimension shots using a resource pack, stuff like that
Coal - Things you want to avoid. Examples:
Addressing Mojang directly (or worse, Notch): We've all seen the people who think this a direct line to Mojang, it wouldn't hurt to remind them it isn't
"It can be optional" and other silly excuses
Taking constructive criticism as a personal attack: Because while it should be obvious, somehow it isn't apparently.
The idea is to make it solely about how you present the idea, and not about the idea itself. The problem is people might want to use it to give feedback instead and say a really smart idea is automatically "Coal" level because they address Mojang directly, or say that an extremely bad idea (like... invisible Creepers that can see you from 1000 blocks away and go through walls) is good just because they made a mod for it.
I don't like this at all. It is further iterating upon a philosophy I dislike, which is this emphasis on the presentation, sounds, pictures etc. It should not be a focus, it should be a footnote.
I also sort of agree with Chameleon. This is like "Badprenup's 20 random things in suggestions ranked from amazing to terrible", not an actual, comprehensive rating system. If you step back a minute and think about an actual system of rating suggestions and comparing them, you realise: this can only end in flames. Just imagine.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Formerly Gamelord. Pixelmon Server Owner. Server IP: pixelmonprisma.mc-server.net | Server Discord:https://discord.gg/HkK855b
I don't mean for this to sound snooty, but even if a rating system was generally accepted. I wouldn't bother adding it. There's no need for some sort of suggestions "grading system" when there's already a massive guide. Also, said system would require some extreme retweaks and whatnot since it would all be highly subjective.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Unofficial Suggestion Guide - Everything you need to know to not make goofy mistakes in a suggestion! Honestly though, you should really go there.
*Yes, I have a backup uploaded in case someone decides to troll it. I can also rollback any undesirable changes should things get too bad.*
The idea is to copy paste the parts and add in supporting details: Example as given in the rubric itself:
This has been updated to better reflect intention of use.
Total 34 /100 (BAD)
Presentation 18 /30
Spelling 8 /8
Grammar 6 /8
Formatting 4 /14
Idea 14 /50
Originality 1 /3
Thematic 1 /3
Usefulness 4 /16
Balance 3 /12
Gameplay 5 /16
Followup 2 /20
Open2crit? 1 /15
Approval 1 /5
Spelling (8/8) - Reasonable spelling errors. No difficulty understanding words.
Grammar (6/8) - Some Hanging participles may cause confusion.
Formatting (4/14) - This entire suggestion seems like a brainfart. It feels rushed and confusing. Spend a little more time reorganizing your thoughts so we can understand it.
Originality (1/3) - Flying jets are one of the least original things since sandwiches.
Thematic (1/3) - Flying jets simply do not fit with Minecraft's themes. There's too many assumptions and not enough things in game backing inclusion.
Usefulness (4/16) - There are already potions and other effects that take care of this problem.
Balance (3/12) - There are a TON of issues with this suggestion from the bombs griefing other player's creations without being able to be stopped, high speed travel which can cause disconnects, and invulnerability.
Gameplay (5/16) - This is broken. While novel, the novelty would wear off and it would become boring relatively quickly; or frustrating for anyone not in a jet.
Open2crit? (1/15) - OP has thrown the "troll" card on everyone that disagreed with him.
Approval (1/5) - Considering the amount of respect the OP is showing others, this isn't surprising.
Obviously, with above, you'd want to add supporting details here, but it should work as a running rubric. Make sure you turn [BB] on or you'll end up with a very naughty looking table.
Obviously, with above, you'd want to add supporting details here, but it should work as a running rubric. Make sure you turn [BB] on or you'll end up with a very naughty looking table.
I think it's best we not try to implement anything like this at all. If somebody wants to be critic of the year and start copy-pasting this stuff into every suggestion they go into, they can go ahead, but I do not think that anything of the sort should be "official".
"Yeah both these suggestions are pretty good, but if you completely ignore the topic, which we know you will, you will see that this one has been rated 10 points lower by <insert highly respected critic i.e. not me> for being written by a non-native English speaker. I guess you are just going to no support for the post count and move on, then! Jolly good!"
Will happen, quote me when it does/doesn't.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Formerly Gamelord. Pixelmon Server Owner. Server IP: pixelmonprisma.mc-server.net | Server Discord:https://discord.gg/HkK855b
I think it's best we not try to implement anything like this at all. If somebody wants to be critic of the year and start copy-pasting this stuff into every suggestion they go into, they can go ahead, but I do not think that anything of the sort should be "official".
Agreed with Gamelord. Too much subjectivity, too many using the rating as a points system and not as a critique.
Hmm, to answer both points: the idea is that its a rubric. It's meant to use a rating system to help a critic identify potential problems and issues within a suggestion.
This means that it is far less subjective as each point is individually tackled; namely it removes the subjectivity by placing it in objective quantified values. Perhaps the most subjective part is the individual rating. Suggestions can only be as perfect as the person writing it; so I disagree with your statements there, Chameleonred.
In response to Gamelord, you have a bit more of a point; but the idea isn't to simply copypasta random numbers, but after the hyphens to also add in reasons for the particular grade.
Thematic (1/3) -
The above is poor.
Thematic (1/3) - Flying jets simply do not fit with Minecraft's themes. There's too many assumptions and not enough things in game backing inclusion.
Is the intention. So while it may start as copypasta, the whole point is that there is actual effort put into the criticism as opposed to a catch all "herp derp numbers because" type of deal.
My running shtick here has been "supporting details", carpet bombing a suggestion with a numbered rubric is about 20% of the job. If you are going to just do that without adding in necessary information; it's better to just leave the thread with a nod and a back. However, if you fill each section after the hyphen (or dash or slash or whatever the minus symbol is called when used in formal writing), then I fail to see how this couldn't be a useful tool.
I'll edit my post to better reflect my intention.
Whether you use it in one's post or no, the rubric can also be used to better help a critic isolate and identify problem areas of a suggestion to better help OP tackle the major issues that hold it back; or minor issues that can help a suggestion truly shine.
Performing fire-from-hip cowboy-justice is well and good; but if you want something with a defined metric; it's been supplied. BadPrenup supplied an effective system to judge a suggestion using qualifying criterion. I supplied a metric using a rubric. Instead of flat out denying it because of minor distaste or lack of preference; try to work with us to create something you think we could use.
I'm open to suggestion on my rubric and already have ideas on how to improve it (and have already improved it in a few areas), but I can't work with "I don't think we should use this at all".
Also, who wants the title "critic of the year"? It seems a hollow blessing and a giant target painted on the critic's back instead of an accolade. It should be enough that we all try our hardest to improve the forum.
Added "Mojang mentioned this once!" to the suggestion presentation/details section. As for that rating rubric thing in post #134, that sort of works, just without the rank stuff.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Unofficial Suggestion Guide - Everything you need to know to not make goofy mistakes in a suggestion! Honestly though, you should really go there.
I did update the rubrick to remove the ranking system. It uses a flat numeric system. I also updated it to include a section for visual aides; there's also a lengthy comment.
Visual Aids include images, youtube videos, and any worth1000s that dress and improve the suggestion.
Please remember that not all suggestions need visual aids; and if they do, not all suggestions need the SAME visual aids.
If you don't think that visual aids are necessary to the presentation of a suggestion and only act to help a great suggestion instead of make a great suggestion; then fill it in with 20 (or 19 if you're French).
The last sentence is a bit wordy; but it says: if you think visual aids are necessary, rate it. If you think visual aids are unnecessary or fluff, give it a 20 (basically ignoring the rating). This should please both sides.
Great update to the old guide, but one thing. I've noticed lately that many new members are ending there title with a question mark, which doesn't make any sense. I mean, your not asking, your giving a suggestion. Maybe something about that could be added to the section about titles.
Great update to the old guide, but one thing. I've noticed lately that many new members are ending there title with a question mark, which doesn't make any sense. I mean, your not asking, your giving a suggestion. Maybe something about that could be added to the section about titles.
To use a basic idea as an example. Herobrine. The suggester uses the title "Herobrine?" as a contraction of "What about Herobrine?" It's a rhetorical, I suppose. If you're asked by somebody if you have an idea on how to solve a problem, you might expect to respond with such an answer, because the context isn't really needed. That's my guess on the reason, anyway.
I agree though, it is weird. I don't think it is an issue though. It isn't so much asking a question as asking for approval (as in "how about...?")
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Formerly Gamelord. Pixelmon Server Owner. Server IP: pixelmonprisma.mc-server.net | Server Discord:https://discord.gg/HkK855b
Yeah, "suggestions" doesn't mean "Open to suggestion", it means you are actually actively SUGGESTING something.
"Should we add aggressive boars?" - Well, hell, I don't know. Should we? Aren't you the one that's supposed to be selling that idea?
As I said. If the suggestion is titled 'Aggressive Boars?', I see it more as 'How About Aggressive Boars?' than 'Should we add Aggressive Boars?'. It is a rhetorical.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Formerly Gamelord. Pixelmon Server Owner. Server IP: pixelmonprisma.mc-server.net | Server Discord:https://discord.gg/HkK855b
Yeah, "suggestions" doesn't mean "Open to suggestion", it means you are actually actively SUGGESTING something.
"Should we add aggressive boars?" - Well, hell, I don't know. Should we? Aren't you the one that's supposed to be selling that idea?
This should be something that is enforced a bit more by mods and not just the guide (which it already mentions), as people keep making threads where they name one animal they want in the game, and then just end it with "so wat animals do U guys want in the game? ;)" Then they go on to make 4 more threads like this because nothing is ever done about them.
This should be something that is enforced a bit more by mods and not just the guide (which it already mentions), as people keep making threads where they name one animal they want in the game, and then just end it with "so wat animals do U guys want in the game? ;)" Then they go on to make 4 more threads like this because nothing is ever done about them.
well, That sort of runs in that mod gray area. Proposing a question in the form of a suggestion isn't against the rules; so there'd be nothing there to enforce. It's one of those things where the community has to actively show disfavor toward. Don't call the police when community shaming works just as well.
Yeah, that guy in the avatar is me. I'm *that* strange. It happens. Sometimes people act like that. Just go with it. I can offer help with suggestions even before you post them - NOT make your suggestions - but help you with them.
Either or I suppose, but I want to stress now and throughout the process (if we get into discussion on it), that it would be for rating the amount of effort put into a suggestion, not for the quality of the idea itself. My biggest concern is people using it and arbitrarily rating an idea poorly just because they forgot a mob stat or didn't use pictures, instead of focusing on the idea itself.
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/minecraft-discussion/suggestions/2775557-guidelines-for-the-suggestions-forum
These two statements seem contradictory. Can you elaborate on this? It's the first I've heard of this, but I don't think I'll like it.
The idea was to include in this guide for structuring an idea on things that make your suggestion look better and give people more to discuss. This is what I originally wrote as a concept:
Iron - These things would be the base requirements for writing a decent suggestion, that everyone should be able to include. Examples:
Gold - Things that go above the basic Iron-level of content, but isn't required. Examples:
Diamond - Anything that would fall into the Overachiever's guide basically. Examples:
Coal - Things you want to avoid. Examples:
The idea is to make it solely about how you present the idea, and not about the idea itself. The problem is people might want to use it to give feedback instead and say a really smart idea is automatically "Coal" level because they address Mojang directly, or say that an extremely bad idea (like... invisible Creepers that can see you from 1000 blocks away and go through walls) is good just because they made a mod for it.
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/minecraft-discussion/suggestions/2775557-guidelines-for-the-suggestions-forum
To a certain degree I like the concept, but I honestly think it could be just better put as a list of good things to do and things to avoid. Having a ranking system like this can easily get confusing or arbitrary (like the MPAA's movie rating system) if not done well, and there's not really a need to make a well-done system for this.
If you are planning to make a suggestion, please read this.
If you want to know more, you can read this.
For those who complain about post-Beta generation, you might want to see this.
Yeah I agree for the most part, it is kind of arbitrary on what each level has (except Coal and Iron, as basic things to have or avoid are obvious, but somehow not obvious to people making suggestions). I think that is why we never did it.
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/minecraft-discussion/suggestions/2775557-guidelines-for-the-suggestions-forum
I don't like this at all. It is further iterating upon a philosophy I dislike, which is this emphasis on the presentation, sounds, pictures etc. It should not be a focus, it should be a footnote.
I also sort of agree with Chameleon. This is like "Badprenup's 20 random things in suggestions ranked from amazing to terrible", not an actual, comprehensive rating system. If you step back a minute and think about an actual system of rating suggestions and comparing them, you realise: this can only end in flames. Just imagine.
I don't mean for this to sound snooty, but even if a rating system was generally accepted. I wouldn't bother adding it. There's no need for some sort of suggestions "grading system" when there's already a massive guide. Also, said system would require some extreme retweaks and whatnot since it would all be highly subjective.
The Unofficial Suggestion Guide - Everything you need to know to not make goofy mistakes in a suggestion! Honestly though, you should really go there.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LQpcjIoDv91vbctO8MOXw8gj2804YdXbRqT6FjEPdcQ/edit#gid=0 <-- That's what I have uploaded that can be used as a rubric.
*Yes, I have a backup uploaded in case someone decides to troll it. I can also rollback any undesirable changes should things get too bad.*
The idea is to copy paste the parts and add in supporting details: Example as given in the rubric itself:
Obviously, with above, you'd want to add supporting details here, but it should work as a running rubric. Make sure you turn [BB] on or you'll end up with a very naughty looking table.
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
I think it's best we not try to implement anything like this at all. If somebody wants to be critic of the year and start copy-pasting this stuff into every suggestion they go into, they can go ahead, but I do not think that anything of the sort should be "official".
"Yeah both these suggestions are pretty good, but if you completely ignore the topic, which we know you will, you will see that this one has been rated 10 points lower by <insert highly respected critic i.e. not me> for being written by a non-native English speaker. I guess you are just going to no support for the post count and move on, then! Jolly good!"
Will happen, quote me when it does/doesn't.
Agreed with Gamelord. Too much subjectivity, too many using the rating as a points system and not as a critique.
If you are planning to make a suggestion, please read this.
If you want to know more, you can read this.
For those who complain about post-Beta generation, you might want to see this.
Hmm, to answer both points: the idea is that its a rubric. It's meant to use a rating system to help a critic identify potential problems and issues within a suggestion.
This means that it is far less subjective as each point is individually tackled; namely it removes the subjectivity by placing it in objective quantified values. Perhaps the most subjective part is the individual rating. Suggestions can only be as perfect as the person writing it; so I disagree with your statements there, Chameleonred.
In response to Gamelord, you have a bit more of a point; but the idea isn't to simply copypasta random numbers, but after the hyphens to also add in reasons for the particular grade.
The above is poor.
Is the intention. So while it may start as copypasta, the whole point is that there is actual effort put into the criticism as opposed to a catch all "herp derp numbers because" type of deal.
My running shtick here has been "supporting details", carpet bombing a suggestion with a numbered rubric is about 20% of the job. If you are going to just do that without adding in necessary information; it's better to just leave the thread with a nod and a back. However, if you fill each section after the hyphen (or dash or slash or whatever the minus symbol is called when used in formal writing), then I fail to see how this couldn't be a useful tool.
I'll edit my post to better reflect my intention.
Whether you use it in one's post or no, the rubric can also be used to better help a critic isolate and identify problem areas of a suggestion to better help OP tackle the major issues that hold it back; or minor issues that can help a suggestion truly shine.
Performing fire-from-hip cowboy-justice is well and good; but if you want something with a defined metric; it's been supplied. BadPrenup supplied an effective system to judge a suggestion using qualifying criterion. I supplied a metric using a rubric. Instead of flat out denying it because of minor distaste or lack of preference; try to work with us to create something you think we could use.
I'm open to suggestion on my rubric and already have ideas on how to improve it (and have already improved it in a few areas), but I can't work with "I don't think we should use this at all".
Also, who wants the title "critic of the year"? It seems a hollow blessing and a giant target painted on the critic's back instead of an accolade. It should be enough that we all try our hardest to improve the forum.
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
Added "Mojang mentioned this once!" to the suggestion presentation/details section. As for that rating rubric thing in post #134, that sort of works, just without the rank stuff.
The Unofficial Suggestion Guide - Everything you need to know to not make goofy mistakes in a suggestion! Honestly though, you should really go there.
I did update the rubrick to remove the ranking system. It uses a flat numeric system. I also updated it to include a section for visual aides; there's also a lengthy comment.
The last sentence is a bit wordy; but it says: if you think visual aids are necessary, rate it. If you think visual aids are unnecessary or fluff, give it a 20 (basically ignoring the rating). This should please both sides.
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
Great update to the old guide, but one thing. I've noticed lately that many new members are ending there title with a question mark, which doesn't make any sense. I mean, your not asking, your giving a suggestion. Maybe something about that could be added to the section about titles.
To use a basic idea as an example. Herobrine. The suggester uses the title "Herobrine?" as a contraction of "What about Herobrine?" It's a rhetorical, I suppose. If you're asked by somebody if you have an idea on how to solve a problem, you might expect to respond with such an answer, because the context isn't really needed. That's my guess on the reason, anyway.
I agree though, it is weird. I don't think it is an issue though. It isn't so much asking a question as asking for approval (as in "how about...?")
Yeah, "suggestions" doesn't mean "Open to suggestion", it means you are actually actively SUGGESTING something.
"Should we add aggressive boars?" - Well, hell, I don't know. Should we? Aren't you the one that's supposed to be selling that idea?
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
As I said. If the suggestion is titled 'Aggressive Boars?', I see it more as 'How About Aggressive Boars?' than 'Should we add Aggressive Boars?'. It is a rhetorical.
This should be something that is enforced a bit more by mods and not just the guide (which it already mentions), as people keep making threads where they name one animal they want in the game, and then just end it with "so wat animals do U guys want in the game? ;)" Then they go on to make 4 more threads like this because nothing is ever done about them.
well, That sort of runs in that mod gray area. Proposing a question in the form of a suggestion isn't against the rules; so there'd be nothing there to enforce. It's one of those things where the community has to actively show disfavor toward. Don't call the police when community shaming works just as well.
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
Not really, since you can relate them.
Yeah, that guy in the avatar is me. I'm *that* strange. It happens. Sometimes people act like that. Just go with it. I can offer help with suggestions even before you post them - NOT make your suggestions - but help you with them.
Unofficial Suggestions Guide (2.0) - by Theriasis
Unofficial Critics Guide - by yoshi9048