I'm building a variable level library and rather than have whole walls retract, I would like to instead retract separate rows.
Pic:
I would like the top 3 pistons to operate independantly from the bottom 3.
I've been able to get the top three working alone by doing this:
It's the bottom 3 that are causing me fits right now :sad.gif:
This is as the closest I've come to something that may work, I just can't find a way to control it.
I'm building a variable level library and rather than have whole walls retract, I would like to instead retract separate rows.
It's the bottom 3 that are causing me fits right now :sad.gif:
This is as the closest I've come to something that may work, I just can't find a way to control it.
Please help me, oh gurus of redstone.
Your issue is that you need to then supply power to that bottom row of torches, as to invert the power another time:
Though someone above had a better way of doing it, I was just taking your method and adding in what was missing. You were on the right track to something workable.
Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable. If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME. Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.
Pic:
I would like the top 3 pistons to operate independantly from the bottom 3.
I've been able to get the top three working alone by doing this:
It's the bottom 3 that are causing me fits right now :sad.gif:
This is as the closest I've come to something that may work, I just can't find a way to control it.
Please help me, oh gurus of redstone.
um. yeah. cause developer textures suck.
Fail. He's trying to control each row independently.
Also, that's a very large way of doing it.
Here's a simpler and smaller way and doesn't involve an extra tick of delay OR inverting the signal.
Your issue is that you need to then supply power to that bottom row of torches, as to invert the power another time:
Though someone above had a better way of doing it, I was just taking your method and adding in what was missing. You were on the right track to something workable.