This site works best with JavaScript enabled. Please enable JavaScript to get the best experience from this site.
This seems to work.
It's 4 rows of 4 segments each with repeaters leading the inputs to all the bottom blocks.
The standard segment is on the left in the third picture and one segment in each row is like the right instead, a different segment in each row.
It uses a lot of repeaters so it's not all that fast, perhaps it could be rearranged to use fewer.
Just testing.
I tested a variant with no repeaters whatsoever and it was about twice as fast.
Btw, if you meant at least 3 active inputs I think you can add a fifth row with only the standard segments to handle the case where all 4 inputs are active.
thanks in advance:)[/p]
This seems to work.
It's 4 rows of 4 segments each with repeaters leading the inputs to all the bottom blocks.
The standard segment is on the left in the third picture and one segment in each row is like the right instead, a different segment in each row.
It uses a lot of repeaters so it's not all that fast, perhaps it could be rearranged to use fewer.
Just testing.
I tested a variant with no repeaters whatsoever and it was about twice as fast.
Btw, if you meant at least 3 active inputs I think you can add a fifth row with only the standard segments to handle the case where all 4 inputs are active.
Just testing.