Minecraft Forums

Any ETA on Satisforestry update release?

Hello Reika,

If it is possible, can you please grant me permission to use your mods in my work-in-progress modpack, Apocalypse Orchestra?

I will agree to all 6 rules, such that:

- Users of the pack will not have permission to reupload and redistribute the pack
- Under no circumstances will I or the users of the pack extract your mods from the pack and rehost them
- The pack complies with the rules regarding third-party modification
- The pack will not generate income, in any way, shape, or form.
- I will not try to claim credit for any of your mods under any circumstance
- I have made sure I have downloaded an official release version, and I have not edited the files in any way

Thank you, and please respond when needed.

Hello Reika.I have a question about the use of the Custom Recipe Configs.If I understood correctly,I made a folder inside of the Reika folder called RotaryCraft_CustomRecipes. I put in some text files but it doesn't seem to work(I copied your examples on Git to experiment).So what exactly did I do wrong? Thank you for your time.

Well this is what my Reika folder looks like.I tried attaching the ".recipe_[machine]" as extension,don't know if it was right.

Hello.

I'm currently in the progress of implementing Rotarycraft and Reactorcraft in my private pack that I will not release, it's just for myself and I've stumbled across S:"Core Recipe Editing"=X in the Rotarycraft config. I've looked through github to find what to put there and determined [email protected] should be the right string suggested by:

//s.equals("[email protected]"+RotaryCraft.instance.getModVersion().toString());

but since that line is commented out, isValidRecipeModString() always returns false. So in order to use this I need to change that line and recompile Rotarycraft ? Which is not a problem but I wanted to ask beforehand in order to know if this is really what I'm looking for, but since most hardcoded recipes have RecipeLevel.CORE, I guess it is to modify/remove existing recipes. Now I'm wondering if I got that right and how to use the RotaryCraft_RecipeModding.cfg because I could not find out what to put in there based on the source code.

They should be just .recipes_grinder or .recipes_blastfurnace, no [ or ]

Quote from InterPlay02»

And @Kataiser9, no... It wasn't enough. I've made just one injector, as you can see on the image. But, even with that, the Liquid Nitrogen levels are getting lower and lower.

Just to be sure: I previously assumed you were running the units at 1-tick operation times. I don't have an instance with RoC/ReC handy at the moment, but you said you have each unit attached to a jet engine with a 16x (presumably torque) gearbox. My napkin math could be flawed (...and I apologize if it is), but I'm pretty sure that at that speed (4096 krad/s), you'd have an operation time of two seconds.

In other words, if that's correct, your stuff's running forty times slower than it could be with slightly different ratios. Double the speed (i.e. use an 8x torque gearbox instead of 16x) and you'll produce slightly less coolant (1600 mb instead of 2000, I think?) but with the 40x operational speed boost, obviously your production will be far higher.

Also, I misremembered my old setup - I had two refrigeration units for my reactor, not one. That was plenty, though.

The problem with that assumption is that it is only a 4x increase in torque (and therefore a 4x increase in power) for 1600 mB per operation, which is a 16x increase in production speed - while to get a 16x increase in production speed from 2 seconds, you'd need to go to 2.5 seconds, and with the approximate "3 seconds off per doubling of speed", to get the same production speed increase with increasing the angular speed input, you would need a whopping 18x times increase in speed and therefor 18x increase in power consumption for the same. The best way to do it is to max out the torque first, then put as much speed into it as you have available after - this will give you the most LN2 per tick for your power input.

Has anything changed with Chromaticraft burrow worldgen in v28?Because I have created two to three worlds and can't seem to find sandy Burrows,when in v26 they were pretty abundant.Am I just unlucky? Also @Silfryi thanks for the clarification on recipes:P

Quote from Reika»

All CC fragment structure generation changed such that they are less clustered and more consistent in spawn rates and positions.

Has the surface recognition pattern remained the same?

Quote from Silfryi»

The problem with that assumption is that it is only a 4x increase in torque (and therefore a 4x increase in power) for 1600 mB per operation, which is a 16x increase in production speed - while to get a 16x increase in production speed from 2 seconds, you'd need to go to 2.5 seconds, and with the approximate "3 seconds off per doubling of speed", to get the same production speed increase with increasing the angular speed input, you would need a whopping 18x times increase in speed and therefor 18x increase in power consumption for the same. The best way to do it is to max out the torque first, then put as much speed into it as you have available after - this will give you the most LN2 per tick for your power input.

Not entirely sure what you mean; I think we may be talking about different things.

To clarify, unless my math is wrong (which it very well could be), it seems like these are the two options we're talking about, assuming one gas turbine per refrigeration unit (as InterPlay02 said was the case):

16x torque gearbox -> 16 kNm at 4 kRad/s. This produces 2000 mB per operation at 2 s per operation, for a total of 1000 mB/s.

8x torque gearbox -> 8 kNm at 8 kRad/s. This produces 1600 mB per operation at 0.05 s per operation, for a total of 32000 mB/s.

Same amount of power either way, but vastly superior production in the latter case. In other words, due to the weird scaling on speed, whether it's more advantageous to focus on torque or speed depends on how much input power you're using. (Old wiki link with formulas here. From a check of the source code, I don't think these formulas have changed.)

I apologize if I misunderstood something you said though, it's been a weird day >_>

Nah, I read what you said wrong - for some reason I was assuming 40 seconds and not 40 ticks.

Quote from Reika»

What?

I mean how they usually look on the surface.Like the picture

Hello out there,

after updating ChromatiCraft to the newest version V29a I got the following exception

So does 'Tinkerer' mean TinkersConstruct? If not, how do I find out the conflicting mod?

Are there known incompatibilities with ChromatiCraft V29a?

With the V28a, it ran smoothly.