GD so many people are typo grammar nazi's, we get it, you caught a mistake.
HOW ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE PATENT THEY ARE SUING OVER IS EXPIRED, YOU MISSED THIS BECAUSE YOU WERE ALL BUSY LOOKING FOR TYPOS.
besides typos make little to no difference in a court room, especially when you put a not limited to statement before hand.
methinks they probably reinstated the patent with a "like new" innovation giving them a surplus ten years or so, but since they referenced Ric's ( or whoever had to pen the sig) patent this case might get tossed for a better more well thought out case.
And really, it takes three seconds to realize that Ric left the company because he made his money already, he sold the company on a patenting technique that would open the door LATER on for more sue cases.
He may not be here today to guide the company, but he set the foundation of how they are going to pull money out of the economy for the next twenty years.
so tell me again why Ric Rich-tard-son is not the face of evil? He is literally trying to con you all into believing none of this idea even presented itself to his mindset while being in the company.
he left before more of the cases went to court why?
hush money.
Uniloc cuts some profits from the cases and throws it into an account for awhile, or an investing hedge fund, soon the investments go sour, the patent expires, come to find out the investing company has to charge interest on their loaned money, but guess who's firm gets the return? Uniloc writes it all off as a loss, and even gets some fringe benefits from it.
This company is located down the street from me............
They have locally sued companies for ******** reasons
before and they are doing it again.... I should walk down the
street and falcon punch them
If Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter were all destroyed, 99% of teens would go insane. If you're one of the 1% that would be laughing at them, copy this into your signature and hope it happens.
"Mindcraft"? Did someone make a typo? or did Uniloc's lawyers not do their proper research for the correct copywrited spelling of said accused infringing property? Seriously, at least get the name right.
Can't someone counter-sue/sue a company for falsely suing a company? Especially to this magnitude? Isn't this like...against the law or something? We should all get together and sue Uniloc for just being a money-hungry, falsely-suing, idiots. They're not even that big of a company. They somehow got away with patening something that would literally pretty much make it so no one can program, so that only they can be the programmers. Isn't it a crime to make a law so that only you can be the big business?
Yes, i guess they would be a "Monopoly" or a Trust which, was outlawed quite a long time ago.
Also, this patent is for license checking using a SMART CARD. NOT. A. SERVER. AND. LOGIN.DUH!
Even are silent friend Herobrine needs Mojang to survive.He will be Minecrafts saviour destroying Uniloc riding a golden enderdragon with his sharpness X sword.
Invalidate the 6857067 patent with 5553143 (Ross).
Sorry I haven't been able to make a proper argument with citations, but it should all be there. I'll look for more tomorrow.
inre assaultmaster post #507: the specification doesn't matter. Claim 107 doesn't comprise a smart card. This '067 patent application should have been restricted as genus/species.
Also, it can be argued that the '067 patent is no longer valid under 35 USC 101, but I'm not sure if that ruling is retroactive. Code is not necessarily non-transient or tangible.
HOW ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE PATENT THEY ARE SUING OVER IS EXPIRED, YOU MISSED THIS BECAUSE YOU WERE ALL BUSY LOOKING FOR TYPOS.
besides typos make little to no difference in a court room, especially when you put a not limited to statement before hand.
methinks they probably reinstated the patent with a "like new" innovation giving them a surplus ten years or so, but since they referenced Ric's ( or whoever had to pen the sig) patent this case might get tossed for a better more well thought out case.
And really, it takes three seconds to realize that Ric left the company because he made his money already, he sold the company on a patenting technique that would open the door LATER on for more sue cases.
He may not be here today to guide the company, but he set the foundation of how they are going to pull money out of the economy for the next twenty years.
so tell me again why Ric Rich-tard-son is not the face of evil? He is literally trying to con you all into believing none of this idea even presented itself to his mindset while being in the company.
he left before more of the cases went to court why?
hush money.
Uniloc cuts some profits from the cases and throws it into an account for awhile, or an investing hedge fund, soon the investments go sour, the patent expires, come to find out the investing company has to charge interest on their loaned money, but guess who's firm gets the return? Uniloc writes it all off as a loss, and even gets some fringe benefits from it.
Player Moderator on Scapecraft Server!
They have locally sued companies for ******** reasons
before and they are doing it again.... I should walk down the
street and falcon punch them
If Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter were all destroyed, 99% of teens would go insane. If you're one of the 1% that would be laughing at them, copy this into your signature and hope it happens.
Yes, i guess they would be a "Monopoly" or a Trust which, was outlawed quite a long time ago.
Also, this patent is for license checking using a SMART CARD. NOT. A. SERVER. AND. LOGIN. DUH!
we don't need to hope. it will happen.
Finally, someone with sense who recognizes the fact that in the end the typo will mean absolutely nothing overall to the lawsuit.
Isn't it a rule to not mention HIM in the forums?
Doesn't really matter, even Steven can see how idiotic this whole thing is.
Check out my epic Request!
Yeah I guess.
That is my belief.
Check out my epic Request!
they have what 2 or 3 fans? joke but this will get them tons of hate
MindCraft
a boner mindcrafted on mindcraft and it is huge and has a smiley face on the head of the boner and it's huge.
Sorry I haven't been able to make a proper argument with citations, but it should all be there. I'll look for more tomorrow.
inre assaultmaster post #507: the specification doesn't matter. Claim 107 doesn't comprise a smart card. This '067 patent application should have been restricted as genus/species.
Also, it can be argued that the '067 patent is no longer valid under 35 USC 101, but I'm not sure if that ruling is retroactive. Code is not necessarily non-transient or tangible.
- your friendly neighborhood IP professional
Click on him plz?