Here is the resolution that people have posted a long time ago
Shear roses from rose bushes.
As more snapshots get released it seems less likely Mojang will do anything about roses. Really though I feel this topic has exhausted itself over and over.
What I and probably many others think about this thread still being active ^
Why do you care? It's not like their removing diamond, and the block is technically not being removed, its just being re-textured and renamed.
I am just going to add, that if the rose was retextured and renamed to something different, then it isn't a rose anymore, thus the single rose is still no longer in the game. So the whole 'It's still there, it's just not.' thing doesn't really work.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The problem with the truth, is that it never lies.
Minecraft might not have been meant to be modded, but it certainly is going that direction now. Think about it, the 1.3 merge, resource packs, the ever rumbling train of progress to the mod API....
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
XP Guide Regardless of what change you do, no matter how small, someone will complain. - Jens Bergensten If you want me to see your reply, make sure to quote my post in your reply.
Here is the resolution that people have posted a long time ago
Shear roses from rose bushes.
As more snapshots get released it seems less likely Mojang will do anything about roses. Really though I feel this topic has exhausted itself over and over.
What I and probably many others think about this thread still being active ^
Mojang cannot add the rose back because the old rose already has 15 variants.
It's just a big pile of smart-ass defenses from the OP about a flower (except not really, because I don't even know what everyone's arguing about anymore; it's all over the place), and countless arguments from repliers.
Can someone slap a big ol' lock on this thread already, please?
I honestly can't bring myself to care about roses. We still have red flowers and now we have a new red flower. Aren't roses bushes in real life anyway?
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Location:
Mars
Join Date:
4/15/2012
Posts:
80
Minecraft:
Half_Life_3
Member Details
First of all, Jeb_ isn't reading this.
I never really thought of it as iconic. The sun wasn't always square, and I actually don't think of it as iconic either. I think the more iconic things are the creeper, the dirt block, and the pickaxe.
The rose isn't gone, it was retextured and named to poppy. Iron golems could give villagers random flowers.
Roses grow in bushes in the wild, and it looks more realistic than having one rose spawning randomly.
They never deleted the rose, because again, it was just retexture and renamed to poppy.
So you're going to play a modded version of Minecraft, just so you can have your silly rose back?
You made a wall of text to complain about a fixable thing.
There's my two cents, I don't really care if anyone reads it.
I am just going to add, that if the rose was retextured and renamed to something different, then it isn't a rose anymore, thus the single rose is still no longer in the game. So the whole 'It's still there, it's just not.' thing doesn't really work.
If it's not called and textured like a singular rose then it isn't one. So if there isn't an item textured and named to be a singular rose then a singular rose is not in the game. While I may not agree with the Op, this argument is stupid, completely flawed, and makes absolutely 0 sense.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The problem with the truth, is that it never lies.
A lot of people use poppies in their builds. If they added roses back, then either of two things could happen:
All poppies used intentionally in people's builds (where they want poppies, not roses) would revert to roses, and poppies would be a new block ID (all flower damage values are used up).
Roses would be a new block ID, and so all blocks that were/would have been roses in the natural terrain will remain poppies, causing players to manually replace them (i.e. with MCEdit)
Yeah, I don't think it's coming back. Just use a resource pack. Aren't language packs (changing the name) also included in it in addition to sound and textures?
If it's not called and textured like a singular rose then it isn't one. So if there isn't an item textured and named to be a singular rose then a singular rose is not in the game. While I may not agree with the Op, this argument is stupid, completely flawed, and makes absolutely 0 sense.
True. But it used to be a rose.
So what you are saying that, say my name is Bob. I change my name to Joe. Does that mean I'm not Bob? No. And if I change my clothes, does that mean I'm not Bob? No.
tl;dr, Deep down, you are still yourself. Which means poppies are roses deep down. Deal with it.
True. But it used to be a rose.
So what you are saying that, say my name is Bob. I change my name to Joe. Does that mean I'm not Bob? No. And if I change my clothes, does that mean I'm not Bob? No.
tl;dr, Deep down, you are still yourself. Which means poppies are roses deep down. Deal with it.
Well yes, but this would be more like if you changed your name and changed your entire physique and face, but kept your skin color the same. While you can say you still have the same memories, you aren't physically the same person anymore. Deal with it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The problem with the truth, is that it never lies.
The original Rose was not deleted. It's texture had a half dozen pixels changed and it was renamed to the Poppy. Red roses in existing worlds will become poppies.
It's still not the rose from before. No matter how similar it is the poppy is not the rose.
Looking back I think the most appropriate action Mojang could have taken is rename the poppy to rose and say it was a texture change.
Roses are not a renewable resource. Renewable resources are things that can be farmed and/or grown. Being able to explore new chunks does not count as "renewable" because then everything is renewable.
I really, really like how the roses are now omitted from minecraft. Because everyone is now complaining about some stupid new thing. If minecraft got rid of gold nuggets, everyone would be freaking out and screaming "WTF MOJANG YOU'RE RUINING THE GAME" even though no one actually uses them.
I really, really like how the roses are now omitted from minecraft. Because everyone is now complaining about some stupid new thing. If minecraft got rid of gold nuggets, everyone would be freaking out and screaming "WTF MOJANG YOU'RE RUINING THE GAME" even though no one actually uses them.
Worst comparison ever.....
Golden nuggets have great use
Gold Nugget Melon
+
Gold Nugget Carrot +
Gold Nugget Gunpowder +
Dye +
Gold Nugget (Forms Star shape)
I completely agree! The rose was not exactly a main part of the game but it was one of the things that made it cool! TBH I love the whole rose bush and two block high flowers ect, but the poppy kinda dissapointed me. Although, not as bad as Spaceboot drags on about. I hope they rename it rose, it would make me abit happier.
Roses didn't die, no-no... They became bigger and more powerful (muahahahah)!
Here is the resolution that people have posted a long time ago
Shear roses from rose bushes.
As more snapshots get released it seems less likely Mojang will do anything about roses. Really though I feel this topic has exhausted itself over and over.
What I and probably many others think about this thread still being active ^
I am just going to add, that if the rose was retextured and renamed to something different, then it isn't a rose anymore, thus the single rose is still no longer in the game. So the whole 'It's still there, it's just not.' thing doesn't really work.
Regardless of what change you do, no matter how small, someone will complain. - Jens Bergensten
If you want me to see your reply, make sure to quote my post in your reply.
BTW!!! Seriously a ROSE Spaceboot1! We have poppies. It is not like they removed the dirt block or the sun/moon!
IP to Connect: enatic.my.pebble.host
Meh.
I never really thought of it as iconic. The sun wasn't always square, and I actually don't think of it as iconic either. I think the more iconic things are the creeper, the dirt block, and the pickaxe.
The rose isn't gone, it was retextured and named to poppy. Iron golems could give villagers random flowers.
Roses grow in bushes in the wild, and it looks more realistic than having one rose spawning randomly.
They never deleted the rose, because again, it was just retexture and renamed to poppy.
So you're going to play a modded version of Minecraft, just so you can have your silly rose back?
You made a wall of text to complain about a fixable thing.
There's my two cents, I don't really care if anyone reads it.
If it's not called and textured like a singular rose then it isn't one. So if there isn't an item textured and named to be a singular rose then a singular rose is not in the game. While I may not agree with the Op, this argument is stupid, completely flawed, and makes absolutely 0 sense.
Hopefully ShoeMiner is in a soundproof room...
True. But it used to be a rose.
So what you are saying that, say my name is Bob. I change my name to Joe. Does that mean I'm not Bob? No. And if I change my clothes, does that mean I'm not Bob? No.
tl;dr, Deep down, you are still yourself. Which means poppies are roses deep down.
Deal with it.
Well yes, but this would be more like if you changed your name and changed your entire physique and face, but kept your skin color the same. While you can say you still have the same memories, you aren't physically the same person anymore.
Deal with it.
Worst comparison ever.....
Golden nuggets have great use
Gold Nugget Melon
+
Gold Nugget Carrot +
Gold Nugget Gunpowder +
Dye +
Gold Nugget
(Forms Star shape)