how is lava and lakes of fire different from a stereotypical hellscape?
That wasn't in the original question post but ok
It's not, we're trying to state why Ice and Snow can be placed in the Nether but not water. We aren't describing a stereotypical Dante's Inferno hellscape.
It's not, we're trying to state why Ice and Snow can be placed in the Nether but not water. We aren't describing a stereotypical Dante's Inferno hellscape.
his idea is nice, though... i guess i would prefer not being able to place any of that in the nether, even though i have never thought about it anyway...
The difference is what you can do with it.
I'd understand being able to put stone in a stereotypical hellscape.
But Ice and Snow?
The fact that these can be placed leaves no reason to believe that the Nether is a stereotypical hellscape.
I highly doubt that.
You missed one.
how is lava and lakes of fire different from a stereotypical hellscape?
you didnt answer the question. here it is again.
how is lava and lakes of fire different from a stereotypical hellscape?
That wasn't in the original question post but ok
It's not, we're trying to state why Ice and Snow can be placed in the Nether but not water. We aren't describing a stereotypical Dante's Inferno hellscape.
The difference is not in how the Nether looks, or in how it forms in the first place.
The difference is what you can do with it.
Exactly. it is a stereotypical hellscape.
that doesn't answer the question. try harder. Hybran was able to answer it.
you said nothing about how the lava and lava lakes are different. please explain.
here it is again.
how is lava and lakes of fire different from a stereotypical hellscape?
So you're only talking about the lava and fire but not the general question, so I win?
****, if it was that easy I'd have money.
Yes, the design of the Nether is something one would expect of a stereotypical hellscape.
I have never denied this or said anything to the contrary so do not think you can use this to your advantage.
I said that the difference that makes the Nether into something other than a stereotypical hellscape is what you can do with it.
Exactly.
You both just made my point. Thank You.
Glad this discussion is settled.
You just ignore the points others make and cut their words apart to make "points" now don't you.
Please... just leave.
You both made my point, here it is below:
how is lava and lakes of fire different from a stereotypical hellscape?
Exactly. Glad this discussion has been settled.
I actually have a post after those words...
Please leave unless you can actually make a rebuttal what I say below:
I have never denied this or said anything to the contrary so do not think you can use this to your advantage.
I said that the difference that makes the Nether into something other than a stereotypical hellscape is what you can do with it.
when asked, this is what you said in post #308
and you said it again in post #311
you answered the question twice.
--------------------------------------------------------------
when asked, Mackinz said in post #315
That's my point exactly. Glad this is settled.
That was edited around the same time as each other, I think I did my explanation first.
To what avail?
You only continue to make yourself look horrible by ignoring the other points people make because they would poke holes in your flawed argument.
So.
If you do not reply to my last post with an actual response to what I said, get out or I am reporting you for trolling.
10 brownie points
noticed that too.
his idea is nice, though... i guess i would prefer not being able to place any of that in the nether, even though i have never thought about it anyway...
the nether is a stereotypical hellscape like you both just said.
Stereotypical hellscapes do not have water.
That's my point