Im currently in need of a 8 tick pulser. That is, when an input is received(no matter how long) it will only output an 8 tick pulse.
Now, This is what I have so far:
Blue Wool: Input Purple Wool: 1 tick Monostable circuit(pulse limiter, pulser) Green Wool: 8 ticks of delay(This can be ignored) Yellow Wool: 8 tick pulse lengthener Red Wool: Output
Now, My question is: Is there a way to make this more compact and/or require less resources?
I did find a much more compact version. 8 ticks of pulse, no matter the input:
(That's ralph. He's been with me since I made my creative world)
lol I used to have a chicken pet on my creative world too He was grounded though..... forever.
Regarding the new pulser you made, wouldn't the repeater get locked while its on if the input is very short? (like, about 2 ticks)
IMO, you should use a piston monostable to avoid repeater locking.
Also, my design will add 4 ticks of delay (determined by the first repeater).
no. These are falling edge monostables. Meaning they only pulse after power is LOST. (Which reminds me. the input should be moved so the block isn't over the restone.
(and, your design can emit, at most, 3 ticks of delay)
no. These are falling edge monostables. Meaning they only pulse after power is LOST. (Which reminds me. the input should be moved so the block isn't over the restone.
(and, your design can emit, at most, 3 ticks of delay)
gurenig is correct. A short pulse will cause the output to lock on.
Here's another option.
It has 4 ticks of delay, but the delay (and one repeater) can be omitted if you take the input directly and add it to the output. However, if you do that, pulses of less than 4 ticks will cause a flicker, since the repeater isn't outputting anything.
EDIT1_______
Rereading, I see you only want 8 ticks no matter how long the input is. That's fairly easy to do, and I'll post another screenshot to demonstrate a cheap method.
EDIT2_______
Here's the final version. It always gives exactly the same output regardless of length of input (even a 1 tick pulse)
Now, This is what I have so far:
Blue Wool: Input
Purple Wool: 1 tick Monostable circuit(pulse limiter, pulser)
Green Wool: 8 ticks of delay(This can be ignored)
Yellow Wool: 8 tick pulse lengthener
Red Wool: Output
Now, My question is: Is there a way to make this more compact and/or require less resources?
The chain of two repeaters on a 4 tick delay adds up to 8 ticks on the output.
I did find a much more compact version. 8 ticks of pulse, no matter the input:
(That's ralph. He's been with me since I made my creative world)
lol I used to have a chicken pet on my creative world too He was grounded though..... forever.
Regarding the new pulser you made, wouldn't the repeater get locked while its on if the input is very short? (like, about 2 ticks)
IMO, you should use a piston monostable to avoid repeater locking.
Also, my design will add 4 ticks of delay (determined by the first repeater).
(and, your design can emit, at most, 3 ticks of delay)
Here's another option.
It has 4 ticks of delay, but the delay (and one repeater) can be omitted if you take the input directly and add it to the output. However, if you do that, pulses of less than 4 ticks will cause a flicker, since the repeater isn't outputting anything.
EDIT1_______
Rereading, I see you only want 8 ticks no matter how long the input is. That's fairly easy to do, and I'll post another screenshot to demonstrate a cheap method.
EDIT2_______
Here's the final version. It always gives exactly the same output regardless of length of input (even a 1 tick pulse)