Disagreeing with a suggestion is not condemning it. It's important to take into consideration the point of views of others and their claims as well.
Whether justified or not, criticism is just that, a personal point of view that must be discussed to the point of refinement.
In the case of reogro and purpletophat; they have made their comments in a professional and courteous manner. I personally see no fault here.
I mean no disrespect here, but it seems that instead of taking their criticism to heart and discussed their cons to arrive at a sound compromise, you instead took defense. This is understandable given the amount of time you put into the thread; but it leaves the original poster difficult to reason with and the concept dies because those that would contribute are fearful of reprisal for giving an honest opinion.
May I make a humble request? When making a new thread, remember that it's a new thread. Leave previous bias and animosity at the door and leave your readers out of your feuds. It's unprofessional.
Good Morning MineCrafters!.... And PurpleTopHat...
Really? Was that necessary? Before I even BEGIN reading the thread, I'm kneedeep into the start of a flame-war. This is NOT a good way to attract readers.
I don't know when this started, or why. But I find this childish and irresponsible.
May I recommend that all offended parties simply take some time away from the thread and cool down a bit?
Really? Was that necessary? Before I even BEGIN reading the thread, I'm kneedeep into the start of a flame-war. This is NOT a good way to attract readers.
I don't know when this started, or why. But I find this childish and irresponsible.
May I recommend that all offended parties simply take some time away from the thread and cool down a bit?
I'll sum it up. He disagrees with my multitudes of posts stating why I think his idea won't work. And he refuses to listen to opinions against his own. So he got mad, and stuff happened.
That's about it.
I am also not offended. I am just saying WHY I think the idea is bad and wouldn't work, or why it should be rethought out
I would like it if they didn't attack the player that made them and attack creepers if they were made by players so would be a bit more useful.
This just opens the idea up to even more abuse. You can essentially create these things all throughout your world or mining systems and never have to worry about mobs killing you.
I'll sum it up. He disagrees with my multitudes of posts stating why I think his idea won't work. And he refuses to listen to opinions against his own. So he got mad, and stuff happened.
That's about it.
I am also not offended. I am just saying WHY I think the idea is bad and wouldn't work, or why it should be rethought out
Why dont you read over the main post one more time, i will remove your name from the intro because Yoshi is right, it is childish. i have taken some of your advice, and when i say "Condemn" i mean not bothering to read the post. btw, sorry for the whole.... mess
This just opens the idea up to even more abuse. You can essentially create these things all throughout your world or mining systems and never have to worry about mobs killing you.
If you checked the thread again, i changed what they attacked. i did it yesterday after what you said, so no that wont happen. and people can do THAT with iron golems. so youve been mad about something i fixed because you told me to...
Seems your post has changed some of the major issues I had. My last gripe is players can make this, effectively making it, still a way to be used for griefing purposes on multiplayer. Someone could still create this and have it used for just killing people.
Assuming that they could not be made and they were not replaced once killed, I'd have no issue with supporting the idea, as it's generally an non-abusable idea that wouldn't take all that much effort to add in the long term. But the fact players can create them makes it open to alot of possible abuse.
Seems your post has changed some of the major issues I had. My last gripe is players can make this, effectively making it, still a way to be used for griefing purposes on multiplayer. Someone could still create this and have it used for just killing people.
Assuming that they could not be made and they were not replaced once killed, I'd have no issue with supporting the idea, as it's generally an non-abusable idea that wouldn't take all that much effort to add in the long term. But the fact players can create them makes it open to alot of possible abuse.
SOUNDS EXTREMELY LOGICAL! From here on out PLAYERS CANNOT MAKE GOLD GOLEMS!
I support this idea then. Everything seems to be balanced to an extent, and now it appears it can't really be abused for anything such as farming a spawning golem (which you removed) or making it to grief (which you've also removed)
Why don't you read the post BEFORE you condemn it next time
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
Hows the model coming?
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
Disagreeing with a suggestion is not condemning it. It's important to take into consideration the point of views of others and their claims as well.
Whether justified or not, criticism is just that, a personal point of view that must be discussed to the point of refinement.
In the case of reogro and purpletophat; they have made their comments in a professional and courteous manner. I personally see no fault here.
I mean no disrespect here, but it seems that instead of taking their criticism to heart and discussed their cons to arrive at a sound compromise, you instead took defense. This is understandable given the amount of time you put into the thread; but it leaves the original poster difficult to reason with and the concept dies because those that would contribute are fearful of reprisal for giving an honest opinion.
May I make a humble request? When making a new thread, remember that it's a new thread. Leave previous bias and animosity at the door and leave your readers out of your feuds. It's unprofessional.
For example: In the first line, you wrote:
Really? Was that necessary? Before I even BEGIN reading the thread, I'm kneedeep into the start of a flame-war. This is NOT a good way to attract readers.
I don't know when this started, or why. But I find this childish and irresponsible.
May I recommend that all offended parties simply take some time away from the thread and cool down a bit?
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
I'll sum it up. He disagrees with my multitudes of posts stating why I think his idea won't work. And he refuses to listen to opinions against his own. So he got mad, and stuff happened.
That's about it.
I am also not offended. I am just saying WHY I think the idea is bad and wouldn't work, or why it should be rethought out
It's useless, and there's no need.
Also, your grammar is atrocious. Please write with the grammar of at least a 10 year old.
This just opens the idea up to even more abuse. You can essentially create these things all throughout your world or mining systems and never have to worry about mobs killing you.
Yes... I tilted a rectangle to make it.
(BTW 600th post >:D)
Why dont you read over the main post one more time, i will remove your name from the intro because Yoshi is right, it is childish. i have taken some of your advice, and when i say "Condemn" i mean not bothering to read the post. btw, sorry for the whole.... mess
If you checked the thread again, i changed what they attacked. i did it yesterday after what you said, so no that wont happen. and people can do THAT with iron golems. so youve been mad about something i fixed because you told me to...
Okay, I'm open for reasoning. Why do you think it should only spawn in pyrimids
Also, LETS SEE IT!
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
Oki Doki =)
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
Attempt? how so?
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
Assuming that they could not be made and they were not replaced once killed, I'd have no issue with supporting the idea, as it's generally an non-abusable idea that wouldn't take all that much effort to add in the long term. But the fact players can create them makes it open to alot of possible abuse.
SOUNDS EXTREMELY LOGICAL! From here on out PLAYERS CANNOT MAKE GOLD GOLEMS!
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD
I don't know. i took it on my cellphone so not too big. i can re-size it if i have to
SuggestionForumCriticLytesonTeamMember
LINK TO GOLD GUARDIAN THREAD