I'm sorry, but if you can't hit a player one hundred blocks away with an arrow while on top of a tower, you're a terrible shot. Being able to do so doesn't make you "epic". In fact, using "epic" that often only makes you look like an obnoxious twelve year old to those of us who actually learned "epic" from a book instead of memegenerator or Youtube.
You're not "epic" and never will be. Stop.
I'm twelve and I use the word "epic" to describe things like quests of large scope and space.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My map that I've spent 4 months on (available for free download!):
I'm sorry, but if you can't hit a player one hundred blocks away with an arrow while on top of a tower, you're a terrible shot. Being able to do so doesn't make you "epic". In fact, using "epic" that often only makes you look like an obnoxious twelve year old to those of us who actually learned "epic" from a book instead of memegenerator or Youtube.
You're not "epic" and never will be. Stop.
The downward curve is really bad, and I used it twice, in a paragraph. I know what it means. I don't use memegenerators, I figure out meme's from forums... I rarely watch YouTube Videos. Also, I know 100 blocks isn't far, but I rarely miss, when most players miss like 50% of the time. I trained for 3 hours with the bow, and have some great aim. I probably have around a 5% miss rate. And I didn't mean the tower as really tall... I meant it as like a 10 block high tower with only a 1 1/2 block shooting limit type tower.
The downward curve is really bad, and I used it twice, in a paragraph. I know what it means. I don't use memegenerators, I figure out meme's from forums... I rarely watch YouTube Videos. Also, I know 100 blocks isn't far, but I rarely miss, when most players miss like 50% of the time. I trained for 3 hours with the bow, and have some great aim. I probably have around a 5% miss rate. And I didn't mean the tower as really tall... I meant it as like a 10 block high tower with only a 1 1/2 block shooting limit type tower.
So, you have about the same ability to aim as anyone who has ever played Quake decently? Damn, you must be a professional! You trained *three hours*? Oh my, we have a god-like archer over here, guys!
My point still stands. You're not as good as you think you are. Stop.
The downward curve is really bad, and I used it twice, in a paragraph. I know what it means. I don't use memegenerators, I figure out meme's from forums... I rarely watch YouTube Videos. Also, I know 100 blocks isn't far, but I rarely miss, when most players miss like 50% of the time. I trained for 3 hours with the bow, and have some great aim. I probably have around a 5% miss rate. And I didn't mean the tower as really tall... I meant it as like a 10 block high tower with only a 1 1/2 block shooting limit type tower.
1. Meh. Most people hit what they want (and I personally only use the bow for creepers and skeletons, which I only bother hitting from about 10 blocks away).
2. Misses don't matter much either, as arrows that don't hit mobs remain intact for you to collect.
3. I can't take you seriously with that gigantic JESUS CHRIST!1!1!!11!! in your signature.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My map that I've spent 4 months on (available for free download!):
So, you have about the same ability to aim as anyone who has ever played Quake decently? Damn, you must be a professional! You trained *three hours*? Oh my, we have a god-like archer over here, guys!
My point still stands. You're not as good as you think you are. Stop.
I know I am not the best, I never said I was. What I am saying is I am better than most players. Also, you are overreacting to my posts. Someone asked a question, I answered truthfully. What is so bad about that?
I know I am not the best, I never said I was. What I am saying is I am better than most players. Also, you are overreacting to my posts. Someone asked a question, I answered truthfully. What is so bad about that?
I'm not overreacting, I'm pointing out that you're not as good as you say you are. The reason you're "better than most players" is because most players are twelve and thirteen, and have never played a shooter without autoaim. Being "better than most players" with an overpowered and easy to use weapon is like being slightly less retarded than the other retards in your ward.
I'm not overreacting, I'm pointing out that you're not as good as you say you are. The reason you're "better than most players" is because most players are twelve and thirteen, and have never played a shooter without autoaim. Being "better than most players" with an overpowered and easy to use weapon is like being slightly less retarded than the other retards in your ward.
Hey, I'm 12. And yes, I'm not good at shooters (you know, because I don't own any [excluding Minecraft + bow and arrows] and only play them at my friends' houses), so I use autoaim, but then, that makes it more fun for me. I don't enjoy playing skillfully, I just enjoy playing. So your logic is a bit flawed as well.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My map that I've spent 4 months on (available for free download!):
Hey, I'm 12. And yes, I'm not good at shooters (you know, because I don't own any [excluding Minecraft + bow and arrows] and only play them at my friends' houses), so I use autoaim, but then, that makes it more fun for me. I don't enjoy playing skillfully, I just enjoy playing. So your logic is a bit flawed as well.
He is stating his skill, not that he enjoys playing. My logic is not flawed as it was only directed towards his particular statements. He is claiming skill, I am informing him that his "skill" isn't as good as he is making it seem.
He is stating his skill, not that he enjoys playing. My logic is not flawed as it was only directed towards his particular statements. He is claiming skill, I am informing him that his "skill" isn't as good as he is making it seem.
Hm. That makes sense then.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My map that I've spent 4 months on (available for free download!):
He is stating his skill, not that he enjoys playing. My logic is not flawed as it was only directed towards his particular statements. He is claiming skill, I am informing him that his "skill" isn't as good as he is making it seem.
I am not trying to make it seem like I am the best, I am not stating I am even close to the best. But it is a 'skill', as you call it, to be good at being able to hit stuff from far away through small areas, and have a very unlikely chance of missing.
I am not trying to make it seem like I am the best, I am not stating I am even close to the best. But it is a 'skill', as you call it, to be good at being able to hit stuff from far away through small areas, and have a very unlikely chance of missing.
Once again you imply that I'm saying you're saying you're the best. I'm not. It may be a "skill", but it is not very "skillful", as I've been saying. You continually state that you are better than most, denying my point of you not being as good as you think you are. Again, being able to use an overpowered and easily used weapon is not that difficult, and is the equivalent of being slightly less retarded than another retard. Don't ignore my point while building strawmen so you can pretend to understand what I'm saying.
In layman's terms, you suck more than you realize.
Once again you imply that I'm saying you're saying you're the best. I'm not. It may be a "skill", but it is not very "skillful", as I've been saying. You continually state that you are better than most, denying my point of you not being as good as you think you are. Again, being able to use an overpowered and easily used weapon is not that difficult, and is the equivalent of being slightly less retarded than another retard. Don't ignore my point while building strawmen so you can pretend to understand what I'm saying.
In layman's terms, you suck more than you realize.
I am not denying your point of me not being as good as I think I am, nor am I acknowledging your point. You also have not seen me shoot the bow, and I have not seen you shoot the bow either. You don't get what I mean, and that much is obvious. The bow is not overpowered, it takes 5 shots to kill a skeleton, which will at most reward you two more. You have to kill at least two spiders to get it. Also, if you don't get enough arrows from skeletons, you have to kill zombies/chickens for feathers, and get way to much unneeded gravel for flint. I saw it is an average weapon, way less overpowered then the diamond sword. 1562/2=781. So 781 mob kills for two diamonds and one stick, that is way more overpowered than the bow. The bow may be long ranged, but it is also a lot harder to use, which is why the majority of Minecraft players use the sword.
I am not denying your point of me not being as good as I think I am, nor am I acknowledging your point. You also have not seen me shoot the bow, and I have not seen you shoot the bow either. You don't get what I mean, and that much is obvious. The bow is not overpowered, it takes 5 shots to kill a skeleton, which will at most reward you two more. You have to kill at least two spiders to get it. Also, if you don't get enough arrows from skeletons, you have to kill zombies/chickens for feathers, and get way to much unneeded gravel for flint. I saw it is an average weapon, way less overpowered then the diamond sword. 1562/2=781. So 781 mob kills for two diamonds and one stick, that is way more overpowered than the bow. The bow may be long ranged, but it is also a lot harder to use, which is why the majority of Minecraft players use the sword.
OK, both of you, arguers. SHUT UP! nobody wants to hear either of you people whine about who's better at shooting a bow or whaever the bloody hell you're arguing about. Take it to a server and battle to the death, just don't spam up this thread, PLEASE!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My theory is that dinosaurs are thin one one end, get much, much bigger in the middle, and are thin again on the other end. This is my theory, and it is mine.
I am not denying your point of me not being as good as I think I am, nor am I acknowledging your point. You also have not seen me shoot the bow, and I have not seen you shoot the bow either. You don't get what I mean, and that much is obvious. The bow is not overpowered, it takes 5 shots to kill a skeleton, which will at most reward you two more. You have to kill at least two spiders to get it. Also, if you don't get enough arrows from skeletons, you have to kill zombies/chickens for feathers, and get way to much unneeded gravel for flint. I saw it is an average weapon, way less overpowered then the diamond sword. 1562/2=781. So 781 mob kills for two diamonds and one stick, that is way more overpowered than the bow. The bow may be long ranged, but it is also a lot harder to use, which is why the majority of Minecraft players use the sword.
You can fire five shots in two or three seconds. Spiders are easy to kill, so that's no large feat. And the majority of Minecraft players use bows because of how easy it is to use and how quickly it can fire and kill and enemy. I've yet to come across a player who cannot get a bow in the first night, but I guess you're the combo breaker. The bow is overpowered, and you're in denial that you're average. It's okay, women don't mind average. Neither do twelve year olds who still say they're "epic" and so-so is "fail".
I'm twelve and I use the word "epic" to describe things like quests of large scope and space.
Then you're doing it right and I congratulate you, sir.
The downward curve is really bad, and I used it twice, in a paragraph. I know what it means. I don't use memegenerators, I figure out meme's from forums... I rarely watch YouTube Videos. Also, I know 100 blocks isn't far, but I rarely miss, when most players miss like 50% of the time. I trained for 3 hours with the bow, and have some great aim. I probably have around a 5% miss rate. And I didn't mean the tower as really tall... I meant it as like a 10 block high tower with only a 1 1/2 block shooting limit type tower.
So, you have about the same ability to aim as anyone who has ever played Quake decently? Damn, you must be a professional! You trained *three hours*? Oh my, we have a god-like archer over here, guys!
My point still stands. You're not as good as you think you are. Stop.
1. Meh. Most people hit what they want (and I personally only use the bow for creepers and skeletons, which I only bother hitting from about 10 blocks away).
2. Misses don't matter much either, as arrows that don't hit mobs remain intact for you to collect.
3. I can't take you seriously with that gigantic JESUS CHRIST!1!1!!11!! in your signature.
I know I am not the best, I never said I was. What I am saying is I am better than most players. Also, you are overreacting to my posts. Someone asked a question, I answered truthfully. What is so bad about that?
I'm not overreacting, I'm pointing out that you're not as good as you say you are. The reason you're "better than most players" is because most players are twelve and thirteen, and have never played a shooter without autoaim. Being "better than most players" with an overpowered and easy to use weapon is like being slightly less retarded than the other retards in your ward.
Hey, I'm 12. And yes, I'm not good at shooters (you know, because I don't own any [excluding Minecraft + bow and arrows] and only play them at my friends' houses), so I use autoaim, but then, that makes it more fun for me. I don't enjoy playing skillfully, I just enjoy playing. So your logic is a bit flawed as well.
He is stating his skill, not that he enjoys playing. My logic is not flawed as it was only directed towards his particular statements. He is claiming skill, I am informing him that his "skill" isn't as good as he is making it seem.
Hm. That makes sense then.
I am not trying to make it seem like I am the best, I am not stating I am even close to the best. But it is a 'skill', as you call it, to be good at being able to hit stuff from far away through small areas, and have a very unlikely chance of missing.
See my About Me section for info about me.
Once again you imply that I'm saying you're saying you're the best. I'm not. It may be a "skill", but it is not very "skillful", as I've been saying. You continually state that you are better than most, denying my point of you not being as good as you think you are. Again, being able to use an overpowered and easily used weapon is not that difficult, and is the equivalent of being slightly less retarded than another retard. Don't ignore my point while building strawmen so you can pretend to understand what I'm saying.
In layman's terms, you suck more than you realize.
I am not denying your point of me not being as good as I think I am, nor am I acknowledging your point. You also have not seen me shoot the bow, and I have not seen you shoot the bow either. You don't get what I mean, and that much is obvious. The bow is not overpowered, it takes 5 shots to kill a skeleton, which will at most reward you two more. You have to kill at least two spiders to get it. Also, if you don't get enough arrows from skeletons, you have to kill zombies/chickens for feathers, and get way to much unneeded gravel for flint. I saw it is an average weapon, way less overpowered then the diamond sword. 1562/2=781. So 781 mob kills for two diamonds and one stick, that is way more overpowered than the bow. The bow may be long ranged, but it is also a lot harder to use, which is why the majority of Minecraft players use the sword.
OK, both of you, arguers. SHUT UP! nobody wants to hear either of you people whine about who's better at shooting a bow or whaever the bloody hell you're arguing about. Take it to a server and battle to the death, just don't spam up this thread, PLEASE!
You can fire five shots in two or three seconds. Spiders are easy to kill, so that's no large feat. And the majority of Minecraft players use bows because of how easy it is to use and how quickly it can fire and kill and enemy. I've yet to come across a player who cannot get a bow in the first night, but I guess you're the combo breaker. The bow is overpowered, and you're in denial that you're average. It's okay, women don't mind average. Neither do twelve year olds who still say they're "epic" and so-so is "fail".