an un-lawful has been given to me like maybe 1 to 2 months ago. i sorted it out with the person who gave it to me. he admitted it was un-lawfully given hence me not having an infraction. he took it away, but only on my infraction bar. if i go to my infractions, it is still stated there. please help.
An infraction was given because of a blatant misunderstanding on the mod's part, but the moderator remained defensive and denied it all the way to the end.
But what can we do.
But then again, nothing really guarantees us that you're not the one remaining defensive and denying the infraction's validity, so yeah.
Here's the transcript. I'll let you be the judge here.
Quote from [color=#000000 »
--------[/color]]--------[/color]']
WaterTipper, you have received an infraction for Spamming. This is a 1 point infraction that will expire on [color=#000000]--------[/color] - [color=#000000]--------[/color].
Hello WaterTipper,
You have been issued an infraction. This infraction has added 1 points to your total, you now have [color=#000000]--------[/color] active infraction points.
Please do not post spam. If you do not have anything constructive to discuss, please do not post. Spam includes, but is not limited to: "tl:dr;", "+1", "this", posting image macros, and nothing but memes or images.
Thank you.
[color=#000000]--------[/color]
Relevant Links:
Minecraftforum.net Rules and Information
View all of your infractions
Your will be unable to post until [color=#000000]--------[/color].
Quote from WaterTipper »
--------[/color]']
Excuse me for asking, but how was my post in any way spamming?
Thank you,
Watertipper
Quote from [color=#000000 »
--------[/color]]--------[/color]']
It was marked as a spammy post because of the "tl;dr" and "wat."
Although, might I ask, what was the quote for in said post?
Quote from WaterTipper »
--------[/color]']
The quote was a critical analysis of the entire OP, with [color=#000000]--------[/color]'s words being in bold and my responses under each line.
It was a pretty lengthy and detailed post actually; I'm surprised it was marked for spam just because of the two specific words.
Quote from WaterTipper »
--------[/color]']
So...can the infraction be removed?
Kind of silly to get an infraction over a misunderstanding in the reporting system.
Quote from [color=#000000 »
--------[/color]]--------[/color]']
It was still a spammy post, regardless of the "detail" in it.
A lot of your responses in the quote were "smh" or "gl with that," or even just a simple "wat."
Quote from WaterTipper »
--------[/color]']
I counted a total of 5 "simple 'wat's", 1 "smh", and 1 "gl with that" in the ~2000 character post.
Kind of a misleading representation you're presenting here, isn't it.
(I might even stick the word "lying" in there, seeing that you seem to think 1.554% is "a lot of [my] responses".)
Anyways, if you're willing to be that stubborn about the misunderstanding on your part, then I see no point in arguing any further other than a waste of my time.
Thank you,
- WaterTipper
Quote from [color=#000000 »
--------[/color]]--------[/color]']
I don't see any misleading representation at all. What was quoted was quoted.
Basically, I entered my response in quote tags, like this:
Quote from OP »
OP's words 1
My response 1
OP's words 2
My response 2
OP's words 3
My response 3
(So on and so forth)
And because my post happened to contain the words "wat," "tl;dr," and other short words mixed in there, the mod just skimmed over it and marked it as an infraction, all because he misunderstood both the context or even the content of the post (which I assume he just decided to ignore in pure laziness), and the rules as well.
The administrator should have at least replied with a "This infraction stands" or "I see where you are coming from" or some other well-phrased fancy language meaning either no or yes.
If the infraction is recent enough to still be active but less recent then the last day or so, I'd suggest going to #minecraftforum and asking there.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Theevilpplz is so fabulous, hetrosexual men turn bi when he passes by.
What exactly WAS the infraction you were issued, by the way, OP?
Infractions are supposed to be between the moderator and the infracted user, and the admin if you decide to appeal. Prancing around about how you got (what you think is) a unfair infraction doesn't help you or the staff. And just creates more rambling about how we are abusive/stupid/whatever-else.
Infractions are supposed to be between the moderator and the infracted user, and the admin if you decide to appeal. Prancing around about how you got (what you think is) a unfair infraction doesn't help you or the staff. And just creates more rambling about how we are abusive/stupid/whatever-else.
no, i sorted it out with the giver of the infraction. that part is over with. i just want to know why it is still on my list of infractions
Just a little sidenote, next time you have any kind of problem regarding staff conduct, please either contact an admin via PM or the Contact Forum Administration. It can be considered rude to call out problems with other members publicly.
"Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence." C. S. Lewis
Just a little sidenote, next time you have any kind of problem regarding staff conduct, please either contact an admin via PM or the Contact Forum Administration. It can be considered rude to call out problems with other members publicly.
oh no! im not trying to be rude like i said, i got the infraction removed but it still shows in my infraction list, not my bar.
"Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence." C. S. Lewis
giver was crafterguy3x3
An infraction was given because of a blatant misunderstanding on the mod's part, but the moderator remained defensive and denied it all the way to the end.
But what can we do.
I did. And no action was taken that I know of.
Here's the transcript. I'll let you be the judge here.
Basically, I entered my response in quote tags, like this:
And because my post happened to contain the words "wat," "tl;dr," and other short words mixed in there, the mod just skimmed over it and marked it as an infraction, all because he misunderstood both the context or even the content of the post (which I assume he just decided to ignore in pure laziness), and the rules as well.
The administrator should have at least replied with a "This infraction stands" or "I see where you are coming from" or some other well-phrased fancy language meaning either no or yes.
If the infraction is recent enough to still be active but less recent then the last day or so, I'd suggest going to #minecraftforum and asking there.
(FYI, I've never had a formal infraction.)
I scored 100% on the Minecraft Trivia Quiz. How much do you know about Minecraft?
TOPICS I MAKE, Y U NO STAY ALIVE?
Infractions are supposed to be between the moderator and the infracted user, and the admin if you decide to appeal. Prancing around about how you got (what you think is) a unfair infraction doesn't help you or the staff. And just creates more rambling about how we are abusive/stupid/whatever-else.
Just a little sidenote, next time you have any kind of problem regarding staff conduct, please either contact an admin via PM or the Contact Forum Administration. It can be considered rude to call out problems with other members publicly.
"Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence." C. S. Lewis
Even though it shows in the list, it does not count towards your current infraction total. It's really just there for our reference.
"Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence." C. S. Lewis