Think the internal architectural style of the Titanic. Lots of brass and classical style stuff. But not a mere ship. No, an AIR ship. A huge Zeppelin. Like the Hindenburg but better and a hell of a lot safer and faster.
.... If you ever figure out how to build that in real life, you better invite me aboard. That sounds freakin' epic!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Comic artist, indie game dev, lots of things. Click image to check out my latest comic series?
(Warning: series may be NSFC [Not Safe For Church], viewer discretion is advised)
If there were some way to take Subaru's boxer engine and their drive train (6-speed manual transmission of course), convert the engine to use TDI technology from Volkswagon, put it in a Mazda Miata (or similarly sized car, I like small cars), install Kia's heated and cooled seats, and throw in Microsoft sync like Ford uses and that would be my dream car.
It has 3+ feet of armor on the front, the exact measurement is classified. Its turret is a semi-automatic 120mm cannon with a 10 round revolving magazine. The Merkava Mk-4 is the only MBT that can load troops with a rear hatch.
It is superior to the M1A2, and considered one of the best tanks in the world.
It has 3+ feet of armor on the front, the exact measurement is classified. Its turret is a semi-automatic 120mm cannon with a 10 round revolving magazine. The Merkava Mk-4 is the only MBT that can load troops with a rear hatch.
It is superior to the M1A2, and considered one of the best tanks in the world.
It also has a low power/weight ratio and is very slow. And the thickness of the armor doesn't matter, it is the kind of armor that does. And the front is heavily sloped, so the amount of armor a round has to penetrate is much more that the actual thickness of the plate.
I forgot about tanks. This would be my ride:
The leopard 2 A6 is probably the best tank in the world. The best tank cannon around, very high power/weight ratio, it is fast, has a very long range and good fuel efficiency, and its armor will stop just about any tank round from the front and side.
Speaking realistically, I'd enjoy a Lotus Elise. I'd want it in black with gold rims because I think it's a damn good looking car like that. It's a pity that there's a habit of selling them in awful, vomit-inducing colors.
I like small and efficient cars, so I wish there was an Elise engineered for fuel economy. It's got a super-light chassis, so it'd be doable.
Speaking realistically, I'd enjoy a Lotus Elise. I'd want it in black with gold rims because I think it's a damn good looking car like that. It's a pity that there's a habit of selling them in awful, vomit-inducing colors.
I like small and efficient cars, so I wish there was an Elise engineered for fuel economy. It's got a super-light chassis, so it'd be doable.
You must be my anti-matter twin! I want the heaviest, least fuel economic road-legal vehicle on the planet, hahah.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Comic artist, indie game dev, lots of things. Click image to check out my latest comic series?
(Warning: series may be NSFC [Not Safe For Church], viewer discretion is advised)
I'm surprised tanks aren't going to completely mechanized shooting yet. The technology and mechanical know-how is there to completely mechanize loading both the round and charge.
Please. Give me a Super-sport series Ducati and I'm happy.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"God put two white people in the jungle without sunscreen. And they [had intercourse] and now we got people. We got Black people, Arab people, Oriental people and with the amount of inbreeding, very few retards. It seems so plausible!"
I'm surprised tanks aren't going to completely mechanized shooting yet. The technology and mechanical know-how is there to completely mechanize loading both the round and charge.
Some tanks have that, its just much much much more reliable and safer to have a loader. That way you can fix jams, not accidentally take someone's hand off, not have the loader break, ect. It has been done in some russian tanks, but all western MBT(at least to my knowedge) have a designated loader for a reason. They have put millions of dollars of R&D into these tanks and found that to work out best.
Some tanks have that, its just much much much more reliable and safer to have a loader. That way you can fix jams, not accidentally take someone's hand off, not have the loader break, ect. It has been done in some russian tanks, but all western MBT(at least to my knowedge) have a designated loader for a reason. They have put millions of dollars of R&D into these tanks and found that to work out best.
While the other's I guess are enough to have a person loading, this one makes me curious. If there is no person loading it, who's hand gets chopped off?
Try uploading the picture to photobucket, then copying the IMG code, then pasting it here.
.... If you ever figure out how to build that in real life, you better invite me aboard. That sounds freakin' epic!
(Warning: series may be NSFC [Not Safe For Church], viewer discretion is advised)
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60
http://pcpartpicker.com/user/SteevyT/saved/21PI
It has 3+ feet of armor on the front, the exact measurement is classified. Its turret is a semi-automatic 120mm cannon with a 10 round revolving magazine. The Merkava Mk-4 is the only MBT that can load troops with a rear hatch.
It is superior to the M1A2, and considered one of the best tanks in the world.
But can it blend?
http://pcpartpicker.com/user/SteevyT/saved/21PI
It also has a low power/weight ratio and is very slow. And the thickness of the armor doesn't matter, it is the kind of armor that does. And the front is heavily sloped, so the amount of armor a round has to penetrate is much more that the actual thickness of the plate.
I forgot about tanks. This would be my ride:
The leopard 2 A6 is probably the best tank in the world. The best tank cannon around, very high power/weight ratio, it is fast, has a very long range and good fuel efficiency, and its armor will stop just about any tank round from the front and side.
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60
One of the worst tanks ever made.
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60
Chill, I was only talking about the looks.
I like small and efficient cars, so I wish there was an Elise engineered for fuel economy. It's got a super-light chassis, so it'd be doable.
You must be my anti-matter twin! I want the heaviest, least fuel economic road-legal vehicle on the planet, hahah.
(Warning: series may be NSFC [Not Safe For Church], viewer discretion is advised)
Sorry if I came off as PO. I'm not, don't worry. Looking back, that was kinda a **** comment. Sorry.
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60
Man, I like the way you think!
Most of these cars wouldn't last crap in a wreck.
"If it can't go 4-wheeling, Then its useless..."
http://pcpartpicker.com/user/SteevyT/saved/21PI
Some tanks have that, its just much much much more reliable and safer to have a loader. That way you can fix jams, not accidentally take someone's hand off, not have the loader break, ect. It has been done in some russian tanks, but all western MBT(at least to my knowedge) have a designated loader for a reason. They have put millions of dollars of R&D into these tanks and found that to work out best.
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60
While the other's I guess are enough to have a person loading, this one makes me curious. If there is no person loading it, who's hand gets chopped off?
http://pcpartpicker.com/user/SteevyT/saved/21PI